Is tars.pro Safe? Security Analysis for TARS AI
Check if tars.pro is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
TARS AI is a technology platform focused on providing an AI architecture protocol on the Solana blockchain. It enables users to deploy and tokenize AI agents, discover and trade AI tokens, and participate in decentralized AI innovation. The platform targets developers, AI enthusiasts, and blockchain users within the Solana ecosystem. The website indicates a small-sized technology business with a focus on blockchain-based AI services. Technically, the site is built on modern web technologies including Next.js and React, with integration of Google Fonts and Google Analytics. However, the main page currently suffers from a client-side application error, which negatively impacts user experience and reliability. Security posture is moderate but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions and privacy protection, which is common in blockchain-related businesses but reduces transparency. Overall, the site shows promise but requires technical and security improvements to enhance trust and functionality.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
TARS AI positions itself as a leading AI protocol on Solana, leveraging blockchain technology to enable AI agent deployment and tokenization. The business model revolves around platform services including AI market trading, staking, and acceleration programs. The company maintains active social media channels on Discord, Twitter, and Telegram, indicating community engagement. The lack of detailed company registration data and minimal contact information suggests a startup or early-stage company. The platform's integration with Solana blockchain aligns it with the growing decentralized finance and AI sectors. Growth potential exists but depends on resolving technical issues and improving transparency.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The current security posture is moderate but incomplete. The absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a concern. The visible client-side error may expose the platform to usability and potential security risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism detected. The use of HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. Overall, the platform should prioritize fixing frontend errors, implementing security headers, and publishing security policies to improve its security maturity.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Fix the client-side application error to ensure stable and reliable user experience.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
TARS AI
The leading AI architecture protocol on Solana. Deploy and tokenise AI agents, discover and trade the top AI tokens, and unlock the future of decentralized AI innovation with Tars
basic
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website main page shows a client-side application error indicating incomplete or broken frontend functionality.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 80 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings