Skip to main content

Is taskon.com a Scam? Security Check Results - taskon.com Reviews

T

Is taskon.com Safe? Security Analysis for Ticklish Techs

Check if taskon.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPress 5.7.11PHPJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:11:55 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Ticklish Techs is a niche technical blog primarily focused on .NET programming and DIY electronics projects, including home automation. The website provides detailed technical articles, code snippets, and project documentation aimed at developers and technology enthusiasts. The blog has a consistent posting history dating back to 2008, indicating a stable content presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 5.7.11 and uses standard web technologies such as JavaScript and CSS. While the site is functional and content-rich, it lacks modern security enhancements such as DNSSEC and security headers, and it does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance with regulations like GDPR. The site uses minimal tracking via WordPress stats and does not display advertising or affiliate marketing. Overall, the website is trustworthy and safe for general audiences but could improve its security posture and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.7.11PHPJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a small-scale content blog without explicit commercial activities or business entity disclosures. Its market positioning is that of a specialized technical resource for .NET developers and DIY electronics hobbyists. The business model appears to be knowledge sharing and community engagement rather than direct monetization. The target audience includes developers interested in .NET, home automation, and electronics projects. The blog maintains a consistent publishing schedule and provides detailed technical content, which supports its credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The site links to related technical resources and GitHub repositories, indicating an ecosystem of open-source and community-driven projects.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

g*****@github.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and has domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited statuses, which help prevent unauthorized domain changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The WordPress version used is outdated, which could expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not patched. Minimal tracking is present, but privacy policies are missing, which is a compliance risk. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by updating software, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

A mostly .NET but also some other cool techs blog featuring technical articles, DIY projects, and programming insights.

Key Services:
Technical blog articlesDIY electronics project documentationProgramming tutorials and insights
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.7.11PHPJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
WordPress Stats (stats.wordpress.com)
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
stats.wordpress.com
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a technical blog focused on .NET and DIY electronics projects.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a:mail.rhein-spree.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

27 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
17 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(129 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:136.243.49.168
Name Servers:
ns1.first-ns.de
robotns2.second-ns.de
robotns3.second-ns.com
MX Records:
10: mail.rhein-spree.com
SOA:Serial: 2024070201, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:96ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a:mail.rhein-spree.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 5.7.11, which is an older version and may lack recent security patches and features. The site uses standard web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with some inline scripts for emoji support and WordPress stats tracking. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags and RSS feeds. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but the domain registrar is Tucows Domains Inc. The site lacks modern security features such as DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improved security posture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website