Skip to main content

Is taxi.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - fms Systems GmbH / taxi.eu Reviews

taxi.eu favicon

Is taxi.eu Safe? Security Analysis for fms Systems GmbH / taxi.eu

Check if taxi.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationAustriamedium
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginBorlabs Cookie pluginjQuery 3.7.1Uncode theme+1 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:53:45 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

taxi.eu is a European taxi ordering platform operated by fms Systems GmbH, headquartered in Vienna, Austria. The company offers a mobile app service that enables users to order taxis in over 160 cities across 8-9 European countries. The platform supports multiple taxi types, live tracking, and various payment methods including Google Pay, Apple Pay, and PayPal. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and integrates social media channels to engage users. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and demonstrates good SEO and mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response contacts. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for commercial services, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, taxi.eu presents a credible and mature digital presence in the transportation sector.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginBorlabs Cookie pluginjQuery 3.7.1Uncode themeGoogle Analytics (via ga event tracking)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a key player in the European taxi app market, leveraging partnerships with local taxi providers in multiple countries. Its business model centers on app-based taxi dispatch and payment facilitation, targeting urban and suburban taxi users seeking convenience and transparency. The presence in major app stores and multiple payment options indicates a focus on user experience and broad accessibility. The lack of direct contact details on the website suggests a centralized support model, possibly via the portal.taxi.eu domain. The company benefits from consistent branding and a clear value proposition, with growth potential in expanding city coverage and payment integrations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which could be improved to foster trust. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified but limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced headers and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

fms Systems GmbH / taxi.eu

Description:

Mit der taxi.eu-App kannst Du in 9 europäischen Ländern in über 160 Städten ganz einfach und schnell ein Taxi bestellen und dabei die Anfahrt des Taxis live verfolgen. Dank der innovativen Vermittlungsmethode erhältst Du das schnellstmögliche Taxi in Deiner Nähe, welches Deine individuellen Wünsche erfüllt.

Key Services:
Taxi orderingLive taxi trackingMultiple payment options including Google Pay, Apple Pay, PayPalTaxi types selection (Limousine, Eco, XXL)Fare estimationRide rating and history management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginBorlabs Cookie pluginjQuery 3.7.1Uncode themeGoogle Analytics (via ga event tracking)
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WebAndroid (Google Play)iOS (Apple Store)Huawei AppGallery
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language support

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a a:mail.taxi.eu ip4:85.125.82.99 include:spf.rbnc.info include:spf.nl2go.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:217.70.134.215
Name Servers:
ns1.bnc.infoDNS only
ns2.bnc.infoDNS only
ns3.bnc.infoDNS only
MX Records:
100: email.taxi.eu
200: mailscanner.bnc.info
SOA:Serial: 24100102, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:131ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with the Uncode theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a focus on SEO and content management. It uses jQuery and Borlabs Cookie for cookie management and consent. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and supports multiple languages. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical stack is standard for commercial websites, with no outdated or vulnerable components detected. Opportunities exist to improve performance and security headers for a more robust technical posture.
Analyze Another Website