Is taxi28888.at Safe? Security Analysis for 1. Villacher Funktaxiverein
Check if taxi28888.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
1. Villacher Funktaxiverein is a regional taxi and shuttle service provider based in Villach, Austria, operating the largest taxi central in the city. The company offers a range of transportation services including airport transfers, shuttle services, courier deliveries, and a dedicated taxi app for convenient booking and payment. Their market position is strong locally with a focus on both general public and business clientele. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and vulnerability disclosures are missing. Overall, the domain registration and business information are consistent and trustworthy, supporting a legitimate business presence.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company targets customers in Villach and the Kärnten region, leveraging partnerships with local businesses and city services. Their business model relies on direct customer bookings via phone and app, with additional services for business clients. The presence of customer testimonials and partner logos enhances credibility. The website content and structure support a professional image, though there is room for improvement in privacy and security transparency. The company appears stable and focused on regional transportation services with a small business size profile.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (2)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. The use of up-to-date WordPress and plugins is assumed but should be regularly audited. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
1. Villacher Funktaxiverein
Taxi and shuttle service company based in Villach, Austria offering transfers, shuttle services, airport flat rates, and courier services with a modern fleet and professional drivers.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent implemented
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security plugins (Cookie Notice)
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress-based taxi service site for Villach, Austria.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 75 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings