Skip to main content

Is taxi40100.at a Scam? Security Check Results - Taxi40100 Reviews

taxi40100.at favicon

Is taxi40100.at Safe? Security Analysis for Taxi40100

Check if taxi40100.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationAustriasmall
TYPO3 CMSjQuery 3.2.1Owl Carousel 2.2.1FontAwesome 5.0.6Cookiebot
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:31:57 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Taxi40100.at is a local Austrian taxi service offering fixed-price rides available 24/7 with booking options via phone or app. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS and incorporates modern web technologies such as jQuery and Owl Carousel. It features a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism powered by Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance and user privacy. The site provides privacy and legal disclosures, enhancing trustworthiness. Technically, the site is well-implemented with HTTPS and security headers, though it lacks explicit security policy and incident response information. Overall, the site presents a professional and user-friendly experience suitable for its target audience.

Detected Technologies

TYPO3 CMSjQuery 3.2.1Owl Carousel 2.2.1FontAwesome 5.0.6Cookiebot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Taxi40100 operates in the transportation sector, targeting general consumers in Austria needing taxi services. The business model focuses on fixed-price taxi rides with 24/7 availability, leveraging digital booking channels. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and complies with privacy regulations. Its partnership ecosystem includes major advertising and analytics providers like Google and Meta. The website's content and technical infrastructure support a small-sized local business with a focus on customer convenience and regulatory compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforcement, presence of security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of Cookiebot for consent management reflects good privacy practices. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security transparency and readiness. No critical security issues were detected, and the site follows best practices for secure web operations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Develop and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Taxi40100

Description:

Taxi service offering fixed price rides, available 24/7 with booking via phone or app.

Key Services:
Taxi rides with fixed pricing24/7 availabilityBooking via phone and app
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
TYPO3 CMSjQuery 3.2.1Owl Carousel 2.2.1FontAwesome 5.0.6Cookiebot
Frameworks:
TYPO3 CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Meta Platforms, Inc.Google
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
CookiebotOMQ Help SystemProven Expert
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a:accfort.taxicenter.cc a:mailrelay.edis.at ip4:91.227.204.105 ip4:91.118.104.58 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:bspf.a1.net a:spf.edis.at include:spf.emailsys.net ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

17 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:80.120.70.88
Name Servers:
dns1.a1.netDNS only
dns2.a1.netDNS only
dns3.a1.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: taxi40100-at.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025012900, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a:accfort.taxicenter.cc a:mailrelay.edis.at ip4:91.227.204.105 ip4:91.118.104.58 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:bspf.a1.net a:spf.edis.at include:spf.emailsys.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, utilizing jQuery 3.2.1, Owl Carousel, and FontAwesome for UI components. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and includes security headers like X-UA-Compatible and Content-Security-Policy. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. No hosting provider details were detected from the HTML content. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small local business, with opportunities to enhance accessibility and security transparency.
Analyze Another Website