Skip to main content

Is taylorandfrancis.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Taylor & Francis Reviews

taylorandfrancis.com favicon

Is taylorandfrancis.com Safe? Security Analysis for Taylor & Francis

Check if taylorandfrancis.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Kingdomenterprise
jQueryModernizrSuperfishGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft Clarity+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:49:24 AM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Taylor & Francis is a well-established global academic publisher specializing in journals, books, and open research across a broad range of disciplines including humanities, social sciences, science, technology, engineering, medicine, and healthcare. The company operates multiple content platforms such as Taylor & Francis Online, Taylor & Francis eBooks, and F1000, serving a diverse audience including academia, industry professionals, government, and healthcare sectors. As a division of Informa plc, Taylor & Francis holds a strong market position with a large enterprise scale and a history dating back to 1998. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, Modernizr, and Superfish for UI enhancements. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and Pardot, all managed with a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, ensuring good performance and security. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, contributing to an excellent user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and registrar domain locks to prevent unauthorized changes. While no explicit security or incident response policies are published, the site uses a consent management platform and adheres to privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security policy, and adding a security.txt file to improve transparency and vulnerability disclosure. Overall, Taylor & Francis demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility, good technical infrastructure, and a solid security posture. The website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy standards, making it a reliable platform for academic publishing and research dissemination.

Detected Technologies

jQueryModernizrSuperfishGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityHotjarPardotWordPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Taylor & Francis operates as a leading academic publisher with a diversified portfolio of journals, books, and open research platforms. Its business model focuses on content creation, licensing, and distribution to academic institutions, researchers, and professionals worldwide. The company benefits from its parent company Informa plc's resources and global reach. Key competitive advantages include a broad subject coverage, multiple specialized platforms, and strong brand recognition. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees, open access publishing charges, and partnerships. The target customer segments span academia, industry, government, and healthcare. The company maintains strategic partnerships with societies, booksellers, and funders, enhancing its market penetration and influence. Growth indicators include expansion into open research and digital content platforms. The partnership ecosystem and consistent branding reinforce its market leadership.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Informa plc

Registration Number:

3099067

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain registrar locks in place. The use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN adds a layer of protection and performance enhancement. Consent management for GDPR compliance is implemented, and multiple analytics tools are used responsibly. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or security.txt file indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were found, and no suspicious activity was detected. The security culture appears to prioritize privacy compliance and user consent but could benefit from more explicit security documentation and dedicated contact channels for security incidents.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Taylor & Francis

Description:

Taylor & Francis publishes knowledge and specialty research spanning humanities, social sciences, science and technology, engineering, medicine and healthcare.

Key Services:
Journal publishingBook publishingOpen research publishingContent platforms (Taylor & Francis Online, eBooks, F1000)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryModernizrSuperfishGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityHotjarPardotWordPress
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with registrar status flags
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • Consent management scripts for GDPR compliance

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityHotjarPardot
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityHotjarPardot
Marketing Tools:
Pardot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.taylorandfrancis.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:937ab994@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:937ab994@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:taylorandfrancis.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/23/2025 (77 days)
SANs:taylorandfrancis.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(135 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.19.252.95, 104.19.253.95
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6813:fd5f, 2606:4700::6813:fc5f
Name Servers:
daisy.ns.cloudflare.com
logan.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2382481111, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.taylorandfrancis.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with a well-structured theme and use of popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Modernizr. Navigation is enhanced with Superfish menus, and the site integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and Pardot. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, contributing to moderate to good performance. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple external scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, scalable, and aligned with best practices for academic publishing websites.
Analyze Another Website