Skip to main content

Is tearitoria.com a Scam? Security Check Results - tearitoria.com Reviews

tearitoria.com favicon

Is tearitoria.com Safe? Security Analysis for Time to Upgrade!

Check if tearitoria.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptFont Awesome 4.7
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:48:35 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.tearitoria.com currently serves as a placeholder page hosted on the SITE123 platform, indicating that the custom domain is connected but requires activation through a premium package. There is no active business content, product or service descriptions, or contact information available on the site. The lack of substantive content and business details suggests the website is not yet operational or publicly launched. From a technical perspective, the site uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with Font Awesome icons, hosted via a CDN associated with SITE123. The page loads moderate resources but lacks advanced SEO, accessibility features, or performance optimizations. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, and no security headers or SSL configuration details are visible in the provided data. Security posture is minimal due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, privacy policies, or incident response information. The site does not collect user data or provide forms, reducing immediate risk but also indicating a lack of compliance readiness. Overall, the site is low trust and low maturity from a security and privacy standpoint. Given these factors, the website poses minimal risk but also offers no business or security assurances. Strategic recommendations include deploying a full website with clear business information, implementing HTTPS with proper security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and adding contact and incident response details to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptFont Awesome 4.7

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Currently, the website does not provide any business intelligence data such as company name, sector, services, or market positioning. The placeholder nature of the site suggests the business is either in early stages or inactive online. No partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators are present. The business model and target audience cannot be determined from the available content. There is no evidence of revenue streams or customer engagement mechanisms. The site is likely a small entity or individual preparing for future launch.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to lack of visible HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no contact or incident response information. No forms or data collection reduce attack surface but also indicate no user engagement. No vulnerabilities or malware detected from the content, but the lack of security best practices and compliance documentation is a concern. The site does not demonstrate readiness for GDPR or other regulatory compliance. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are missing.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and ensure all resources load securely.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website is a placeholder page indicating that the custom domain www.tearitoria.com is connected but requires activation via a premium package. No business description or services are provided.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptFont Awesome 4.7
Platforms:
SITE123
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a placeholder page indicating domain connection but no active content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.enter-system.com
DNS Lookups:1/10

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(115 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:54.76.177.85
Name Servers:
ns1.enter-system.com
ns2.enter-system.com
MX Records:
0: mailme.enter-system.com
20: mailme-backup.enter-system.com
10: mailme.enter-system.com
SOA:Serial: 2022121203, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:568ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.enter-system.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the SITE123 platform using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Font Awesome icons. It is hosted on a CDN provided by f-static.net. The page is minimal and serves as a placeholder with no dynamic content or forms. Performance is moderate given the limited content. Mobile optimization is basic with responsive meta tags but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta descriptions, keywords, or structured data. No analytics or tracking tools are implemented. The technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist once the full site is deployed.
Analyze Another Website