Skip to main content

Is techjockey.com a Scam? Security Check Results - techjockey.com Reviews

T

Is techjockey.com Safe? Security Analysis for Human Verification

Check if techjockey.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptAWS WAFAmazon Ember font
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:41:58 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.techjockey.com is currently inaccessible due to a security challenge page implemented via AWS WAF, requiring human verification through a CAPTCHA. This prevents access to any substantive website content, metadata, or business information. The WHOIS lookup failed to return any registration data, indicating either the domain is unregistered, privacy-protected, or there is an issue with WHOIS data availability. Consequently, no business details, contact information, or compliance policies could be extracted or analyzed. The technical infrastructure shows use of AWS WAF and Amazon Ember fonts, but no CMS or other frameworks are detectable. Security posture cannot be properly assessed due to lack of accessible content and headers. Overall, the site appears to be protected behind a security mechanism that blocks automated access, limiting the ability to perform a full security and compliance analysis.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptAWS WAFAmazon Ember font

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and WHOIS data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain's registration status is unclear, and no company information, market positioning, or service descriptions are available. The presence of AWS WAF suggests an intent to protect the site from bots or attacks, but without content access, no insights into business operations or partnerships can be made.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully evaluated as the site is behind a WAF CAPTCHA challenge. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available. The use of AWS WAF indicates some level of security awareness, but the absence of visible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures limits confidence. The lack of WHOIS data further reduces trust. Overall, the security maturity appears low from an external perspective due to limited transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Work with the site administrators to allow safe, automated access for security and compliance scanning tools to enable full analysis.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website content is blocked behind a security CAPTCHA challenge page using AWS WAF. The actual website content is inaccessible.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptAWS WAFAmazon Ember font

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is inaccessible due to AWS WAF CAPTCHA challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 10% of messages

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none(10% enforcement)
Aggregate Reports:admin@techjockey.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.techjockey.com
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Valid Until:7/22/2026 (320 days)
SANs:*.techjockey.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1728 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:15.207.173.121, 3.6.12.193, 13.126.186.190
Name Servers:
ned.ns.cloudflare.com
nelly.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: techjockey-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2382395046, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:51ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses AWS WAF for web application firewall protection and Amazon Ember font for styling. The HTML content is minimal and serves only to present a CAPTCHA challenge, blocking access to the actual website content. No CMS or other frameworks are detectable. External scripts are loaded from AWS WAF CAPTCHA domains. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to blocked content. The technical setup prioritizes security filtering but at the cost of accessibility for automated tools.
Analyze Another Website