Skip to main content

Is tekbaltic.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - TEK Baltic Reviews

tekbaltic.lv favicon

Is tekbaltic.lv Safe? Security Analysis for TEK Baltic

Check if tekbaltic.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.2Bootstrap 3.3.7jQuery 3.7.1Simple Lightbox pluginCookie Notice plugin
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:35:35 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

TEK Baltic is a specialized technical operations company focused on railway infrastructure in Latvia, offering engineering, construction, supervision, and supply services. The company emphasizes sustainability, safety, and continuous development, supported by over a decade of experience and multiple large-scale projects with notable partners such as Latvijas dzelzceļš and Leonhard Weiss. The website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, providing a professional and accessible user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the detailed company information and certifications support legitimacy. Overall, the site reflects a credible and professional business presence with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Bootstrap 3.3.7jQuery 3.7.1Simple Lightbox pluginCookie Notice plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

TEK Baltic operates in the transportation and energy sectors, primarily serving railway infrastructure clients in Latvia. Their business model centers on providing end-to-end engineering and construction services, including project design, implementation, supervision, and equipment supply. The company maintains strong partnerships with major industry players and government entities, enhancing its market position. The presence of ISO certifications and a detailed project portfolio indicates a commitment to quality and compliance. The company targets infrastructure developers and public sector clients, positioning itself as a reliable regional specialist. Growth potential is supported by ongoing projects and collaborations, though digital marketing and privacy compliance could be enhanced.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@tekbaltic.lv

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību „TEK Baltic”

VAT Number:

LV40103332064

Registration Number:

40103332064

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting basic security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency for security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on available information. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

TEK Baltic

Description:

TEK Baltic is a Technical Operation Company specializing in railway infrastructure, providing engineering solutions, construction project development and implementation, supervision, and supply of equipment and materials. They emphasize sustainability, safety, and continuous development with over ten years of experience.

Key Services:
Construction project developmentConstruction project implementationConstruction supervisionEquipment and material supplyRailway infrastructure research, analysis, and technical support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Bootstrap 3.3.7jQuery 3.7.1Simple Lightbox pluginCookie Notice plugin
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.65.130
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS version 6.8.2 with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, providing a modern and responsive design. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site is hosted on an unknown provider with no explicit hosting details. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website