Is tekstiliana.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Tekstiliana
Check if tekstiliana.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Tekstiliana is a real estate website focused on promoting high-class apartments targeted at modern city environment enthusiasts. The site positions itself as a premium residential offering in Latvia, with a clean and professional presentation. The business model centers on real estate marketing and sales, appealing to a niche audience seeking upscale urban living spaces. The website uses WordPress CMS with modern web technologies and integrates analytics and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot demonstrates awareness of privacy regulations, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks some security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and professionally maintained, but the absence of WHOIS data and contact information limits full trust assessment.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Tekstiliana operates in the real estate sector, targeting a premium market segment with high-class apartments. The website content and structured data suggest a focused business model on residential property promotion. The lack of visible contact details and privacy policies may affect user trust and compliance perception. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates an active approach to customer engagement and data-driven marketing. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or content. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with consistent branding and good content quality, but limited transparency in business and compliance information.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner, which are positive security and privacy indicators. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no evidence of a security.txt file or incident response contact information, which are best practices for vulnerability disclosure and incident management. The use of third-party analytics and tracking services introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers, policies, and transparency.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Tekstiliana
Tekstiliana | Augstākās klases dzīvokļi modernas pilsētvides cienītājiem
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent banner implemented
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress-based real estate site promoting high-class apartments.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
LOWCurrent value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 89 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings