Skip to main content

Is telcobalt.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Netvision Reviews

telcobalt.lv favicon

Is telcobalt.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Netvision

Check if telcobalt.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TelecommunicationsLatviamedium
Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelCookieYes cookie consentGoogle Fonts (Montserrat)Custom CSS and JS
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:32:22 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Netvision is a Latvian telecommunications company specializing in providing optical fiber home internet and interactive TV services. The website offers detailed information about various internet and TV packages, pricing, and features, targeting residential customers in Latvia. The company emphasizes free installation, stable internet speeds, and a broad selection of 133 TV channels with interactive features. The website content is professionally presented in Latvian, with clear calls to action and customer support contact information. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, along with a cookie consent mechanism via CookieYes, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and structured for good SEO performance. However, no explicit CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the website's professional presentation and business information suggest a legitimate operation. Overall, the website scores well on content quality, business credibility, and privacy compliance, with moderate technical and security posture scores. Strategic improvements in security headers, transparency of security policies, and WHOIS data availability would enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelCookieYes cookie consentGoogle Fonts (Montserrat)Custom CSS and JS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Netvision operates in the Latvian telecommunications sector, focusing on residential fiber optic internet and interactive TV services. With over 16 years of market presence, it holds a stable position offering competitive pricing and value-added services such as free installation and WiFi router setup. The business model is subscription-based, targeting households seeking high-speed internet and diverse TV content. The company leverages digital marketing tools and analytics to engage customers and optimize service offerings. The lack of visible partner or subsidiary domains suggests a focused operational scope. Customer satisfaction indicators and contract transparency contribute to a trustworthy brand image in the regional market.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@netvision.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

661*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No direct vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were identified in the content. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and policy disclosures to strengthen resilience and customer trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Netvision

Description:

Netvision offers optical home internet and interactive TV services with free installation, stable speeds, and a wide selection of TV channels.

Key Services:
Optical fiber internetInteractive TV with 133 channelsFree installation and WiFi router setup
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelCookieYes cookie consentGoogle Fonts (Montserrat)Custom CSS and JS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • Use of cookie consent banner

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Facebook Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelGoogle Analytics (implied by GTM)
Marketing Tools:
CookieYes
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:85.31.101.117 ip4:159.148.168.195 ip4:85.31.97.150 ip4:85.31.101.115 ip4:159.148.102.10 ip4:159.148.79.214 ip4:85.31.97.7 ip4:159.148.79.212 ip4:193.46.236.179 ip4:85.31.101.107 ip4:159.148.102.30 ip4:31.170.23.51 ip4:85.31.97.43 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:85.31.97.7
Name Servers:
ns.netvision.lvDNS only
ns2.netvision.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: m.netvision.lv
SOA:Serial: 2024082914, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:66ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:85.31.101.117 ip4:159.148.168.195 ip4:85.31.97.150 ip4:85.31.101.115 ip4:159.148.102.10 ip4:159.148.79.214 ip4:85.31.97.7 ip4:159.148.79.212 ip4:193.46.236.179 ip4:85.31.101.107 ip4:159.148.102.30 ip4:31.170.23.51 ip4:85.31.97.43 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack with Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and CookieYes for analytics and compliance. It loads Google Fonts for typography and custom CSS for styling. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. The site uses multiple forms collecting user address and phone data with consent checkboxes, indicating data privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers and limited metadata beyond basic SEO tags suggest opportunities for technical hardening and improved metadata richness.
Analyze Another Website