Skip to main content

Is telcom.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA "TelCom" Reviews

S

Is telcom.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA "TelCom"

Check if telcom.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TelecommunicationsLatviasmall
HTML5CSS
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:10:10 AM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA TelCom is a Latvian telecommunications company currently presenting a placeholder website indicating a forthcoming new site launch. The site provides essential company contact details, including physical address, emails, phone number, and billing information such as registration and VAT numbers. The business appears to target local Latvian customers and businesses seeking telecom services. The website's technical infrastructure is minimal, built with basic HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms. No analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies are detected, and the site lacks privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS and security headers, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is functional as a placeholder but requires significant improvements in security, compliance, and content to meet professional standards.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the telecommunications sector in Latvia, with a small business profile. The presence of official registration and VAT numbers indicates legitimate business operations. The website's minimal content and lack of marketing or social media presence suggest a low digital maturity level. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business model likely focuses on providing telecom services locally. Growth indicators and competitive positioning cannot be assessed from the current data. The company provides clear contact and billing information, which supports business credibility despite the minimal online presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@telcom.lv
s*****@telcom.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712200****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA "TelCom"

VAT Number:

LV40003899464

Registration Number:

40003899464

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. The absence of HTTPS is a critical issue, exposing users to potential data interception. No security headers or best practices are implemented, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No forms or user data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate data protection risks but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires urgent improvements to protect both the business and its customers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA "TelCom"

Description:

SIA TelCom is a Latvian company located in Riga, providing telecommunications services. The website is currently a placeholder announcing a forthcoming new site. Contact and billing information is provided, including company registration and VAT numbers, and bank details.

Key Services:
Telecommunications services
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a minimal 'coming soon' placeholder page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:85.15.231.203
Name Servers:
ns.mm88.lvDNS only
ns2.mm88.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.mm88.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025051402, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. No external analytics or advertising scripts are present, indicating minimal tracking or marketing efforts. The site appears to be hosted on an unknown provider with no performance or accessibility optimizations evident. The lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. The site is not mobile optimized beyond basic viewport settings. Overall, the technical implementation is minimal and outdated, requiring modernization to meet current web standards and security expectations.
Analyze Another Website