Skip to main content

Is telegram.im a Scam? Security Check Results - Telegram.im Reviews

telegram.im favicon

Is telegram.im Safe? Security Analysis for Telegram.im

Check if telegram.im is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSS3Bootstrap 3.3.4jQuery 1.11.2Font Awesome 4.3.0+5 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:37:01 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Telegram.im operates as an unofficial service providing Telegram button widgets and logo generation tools for website owners and developers. The service targets users who want to integrate Telegram contact options on their websites, promoting Telegram channels, bots, and facilitating user engagement. The website is small-scale and niche-focused, with no official affiliation to Telegram Messenger. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Mobirise framework, hosted on name.com nameservers. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with a good user experience and clear navigation. Security posture is basic; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers or vulnerability disclosures are present. Privacy compliance is minimal but includes a privacy policy and cookie consent modal. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, only a contact/report link for illegal content. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content detected.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3Bootstrap 3.3.4jQuery 1.11.2Font Awesome 4.3.0Google FontsMobirise frameworkJarallax (parallax effect)Masonry layoutSpectrum color picker

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Telegram.im occupies a niche market providing Telegram integration widgets for websites. Its business model is free service provision, likely monetized indirectly or as a value-added tool for Telegram users. The site promotes partner services such as apps2.me and getbtn.com, indicating a small ecosystem of related offerings. The lack of official Telegram affiliation and minimal business information limits its credibility but also reduces regulatory burden. The target audience is webmasters and developers seeking Telegram contact solutions. Growth indicators include usage statistics displayed on the site. The partnership ecosystem is limited but relevant to the widget service niche.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy is published, and no incident response contacts are explicitly provided beyond a general contact/report link. The absence of exposed sensitive data and secure form inputs is positive. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a low-risk widget service but requiring improvements to enhance trust and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Telegram.im

Description:

Telegram.im provides an unofficial instant messaging Telegram button widget service for websites, allowing webmasters to add Telegram contact buttons, generate logos, and promote Telegram channels and bots.

Key Services:
Telegram button widget generationLogo generation for TelegramChannel widget promotionKnowledge base and mini apps links
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3Bootstrap 3.3.4jQuery 1.11.2Font Awesome 4.3.0Google FontsMobirise frameworkJarallax (parallax effect)Masonry layoutSpectrum color picker
Frameworks:
BootstrapMobirise
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent modal implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is an unofficial Telegram button widget service

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 27 days

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Expiry Risk
high(8 days)

DNS Records

A Records:65.108.253.105
Name Servers:
ns1.name.comDNS only
ns1.name.com.WHOIS only
ns2.name.comDNS only
ns2.name.com.WHOIS only
ns3.name.comDNS only
ns3.name.com.WHOIS only
ns4.name.comDNS only
ns4.name.com.WHOIS only
SOA:Serial: 1656118412, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:41ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a solid foundation of common web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Mobirise framework, ensuring responsive design and moderate performance. Hosting is via name.com nameservers, indicating a standard hosting environment. The site uses external resources from Google Fonts and CDNJS for fonts and scripts. Performance is moderate with some modern features like parallax effects and masonry layouts. Technical debt appears low but the absence of advanced security headers and modern security practices indicates room for modernization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. SEO is adequately addressed with meta tags and alternate language links.
Analyze Another Website