Skip to main content

Is telegram.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Telegram Reviews

telegram.org favicon

Is telegram.org Safe? Security Analysis for Telegram

Check if telegram.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Stateslarge
Bootstrap CSSCustom JavaScriptSVG graphicsVideo elementsGoogle Cloud DNS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:15:02 PM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Telegram is a well-established global messaging platform founded in 2003, offering secure, fast, and multi-platform communication services. It targets a broad audience seeking privacy and powerful messaging features, supported by an open API and source code. The website reflects a mature digital presence with excellent content quality, consistent branding, and strong user experience across devices. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap, hosts DNS on Google Cloud, and delivers fast performance with mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and domain protections, though improvements like enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy, but lacks cookie consent mechanisms and explicit terms of service links. Overall, Telegram's website and domain registration indicate high legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap CSSCustom JavaScriptSVG graphicsVideo elementsGoogle Cloud DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Telegram holds a leading position in the secure messaging market, leveraging a free-to-use business model supported by open APIs and broad platform support. Its competitive advantages include strong encryption, multi-device sync, and no limits on media size. The company targets general users globally, emphasizing privacy and speed. The domain's long age and privacy-protected WHOIS data align with its market presence. Telegram maintains an active blog and social media presence, enhancing user engagement and transparency. The absence of direct contact information on the main site suggests a focus on self-service and automated support channels. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Telegram demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and domain-level protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security resilience. The website lacks explicit security headers like Content Security Policy or HSTS, which could further harden defenses. No visible security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and incident management. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partially addressed but could be improved with cookie consent and terms of service clarity. Overall, Telegram's security is robust but could benefit from enhanced transparency and DNS security measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Telegram

Description:

Telegram is a cloud-based mobile and desktop messaging app with a focus on security and speed.

Key Services:
Instant messagingEncrypted chatsMulti-device syncMedia sharingOpen API
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap CSSCustom JavaScriptSVG graphicsVideo elementsGoogle Cloud DNS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WebAndroidiOSDesktop (Windows/Mac/Linux)
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language options

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

100/100
Score
No issues found
SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.161.64.0/28 ip4:95.161.64.16/32 ip4:149.154.160.0/20 ip4:95.161.64.17/32 ip4:149.154.162.125/32 ip4:149.154.162.247/32 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@telegram.org
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.telegram.org
Issuer:Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2
Valid Until:9/12/2026 (371 days)
SANs:*.telegram.org, telegram.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2291 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:149.154.167.99
AAAA Records:2001:67c:4e8:f004::9
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
15: mx110.telegram.org
10: mx101.telegram.org
SOA:Serial: 2017053111, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:37ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.161.64.0/28 ip4:95.161.64.16/32 ip4:149.154.160.0/20 ip4:95.161.64.17/32 ip4:149.154.162.125/32 ip4:149.154.162.247/32 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website employs a modern and performant technical stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, SVG for scalable graphics, and video elements for rich media. DNS is managed via Google Cloud DNS, indicating reliable hosting infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The absence of third-party analytics or tracking scripts indicates a privacy-conscious approach. Performance is fast with no broken elements or errors observed. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and DNS security to reduce technical risks.
Analyze Another Website