Skip to main content

Is telerik.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Telerik Reviews

telerik.com favicon

Is telerik.com Safe? Security Analysis for Telerik

Check if telerik.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/alarge
JavaScriptRive.jsSitefinity InsightOneTrust Cookie ConsentCloudfront CDN+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 10:19:27 AM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Telerik is a well-established software company specializing in professional UI component suites and developer tools for .NET and JavaScript frameworks. Their product portfolio includes comprehensive UI libraries, reporting tools, automated testing solutions, and innovative AI-powered coding assistants. The company targets developers and software teams aiming to accelerate application development across web, mobile, and desktop platforms. With a strong market presence supported by a large developer community and backing from parent company Progress Software Corporation, Telerik maintains a leadership position in the developer tools industry. Technically, the Telerik website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure leveraging modern JavaScript libraries, CDN hosting, and a robust CMS platform (Sitefinity). The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, providing a seamless user experience. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented in compliance with GDPR standards, reflecting a commitment to user data protection. From a security perspective, the website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers, minimizing common web vulnerabilities. However, explicit security policies, incident response details, and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, representing areas for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, likely due to registry privacy or data protection policies, but the website's professional presentation and trust signals mitigate concerns about legitimacy. Overall, Telerik presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies, enhancing transparency on certifications, and providing vulnerability disclosure channels to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptRive.jsSitefinity InsightOneTrust Cookie ConsentCloudfront CDNSVG graphics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Telerik operates in the technology sector, focusing on software development tools and UI component libraries. Their business model revolves around product sales and subscriptions, targeting professional developers and enterprises. The company benefits from a broad ecosystem including AI productivity tools and embedded reporting, which differentiate it from competitors. Telerik's market positioning is strong, supported by a large user base and integration with Progress Software Corporation. The website highlights partnerships with major clients like NASA, Microsoft, and IBM, indicating high trust and adoption. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation, AI integration, and comprehensive developer support. The company leverages a partner ecosystem for sales and distribution, including the Progress store platform.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The Telerik website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Privacy compliance is evident through cookie consent banners and a comprehensive privacy policy aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness visibility. No security contact emails or DPO information are provided, which could hinder incident reporting and compliance audits. The WHOIS data is missing, which is a minor concern but likely due to privacy protection. Overall, the site follows best practices for web security but should enhance its security governance documentation and communication.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Telerik

Description:

Save time building sleek web, mobile and desktop apps with professional .NET UI Components, JavaScript UI Libraries, Reporting and Automated Testing solutions.

Key Services:
.NET UI ComponentsJavaScript UI LibrariesReporting toolsAutomated Testing solutionsAI Coding AssistantsDocument Processing Libraries
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptRive.jsSitefinity InsightOneTrust Cookie ConsentCloudfront CDNSVG graphics
Frameworks:
Sitefinity CMS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerSitefinity InsightCrazy Egg
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Marketing Tools:
Sitefinity InsightCrazy Egg
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a ip4:131.239.30.67 ip4:104.130.106.151 ip4:209.167.231.0/24 ip4:66.48.80.0/25 ip4:204.92.19.0/24 ip4:168.215.71.0/24 ip4:208.66.204.0/22 ip4:209.15.238.123 ip4:205.201.136.0/23 ip4:23.103.224.0/19 ip4:206.191.224.0/19 ip4: 40.103.0.0/16 ip4:82.103.64.247 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:stspg-customer.com include:mailgun.org include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:c503e53751ee581@rep.dmarcanalyzer.com
Forensic Reports:c503e53751ee581@for.dmarcanalyzer.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(205 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.133.11.3
Name Servers:
ns-1332.awsdns-38.org
ns-1813.awsdns-34.co.uk
ns-387.awsdns-48.com
ns-647.awsdns-16.net
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a ip4:131.239.30.67 ip4:104.130.106.151 ip4:209.167.231.0/24 ip4:66.48.80.0/25 ip4:204.92.19.0/24 ip4:168.215.71.0/24 ip4:208.66.204.0/22 ip4:209.15.238.123 ip4:205.201.136.0/23 ip4:23.103.224.0/19 ip4:206.191.224.0/19 ip4: 40.103.0.0/16 ip4:82.103.64.247 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:stspg-customer.com include:mailgun.org include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack including JavaScript libraries like Rive.js, Sitefinity CMS for content management, and Amazon Cloudfront for CDN delivery. It employs asynchronous and deferred script loading to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. The use of cookie consent tools and analytics platforms like Google Tag Manager and Crazy Egg indicates a mature approach to user tracking and privacy. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is advised to prevent vulnerabilities.
Analyze Another Website