Skip to main content

Is templewallet.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Temple Wallet Reviews

templewallet.com favicon

Is templewallet.com Safe? Security Analysis for Temple Wallet

Check if templewallet.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WebflowGoogle Fonts (Inter)jQuery 3.5.1WebFont Loader
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:07:33 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Temple Wallet is a professional and secure multichain Web3 wallet service focusing on the Tezos and Ethereum ecosystems. It offers users the ability to buy, swap, stake tokens, and manage NFTs with a unified experience across multiple wallets. The platform supports browser extensions and mobile applications, providing a seamless user experience. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and includes comprehensive privacy and terms of use policies. Security is emphasized through open-source code and audits by reputable firms such as Least Authority and Cossack Labs. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data introduces some uncertainty about domain legitimacy. Overall, the platform demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure and a strong security posture, making it a trustworthy service for crypto users.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle Fonts (Inter)jQuery 3.5.1WebFont Loader

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Temple Wallet operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting cryptocurrency users and Web3 enthusiasts. Its business model revolves around providing a non-custodial wallet service with integrated token rewards ($TKEY) to incentivize user engagement. The company leverages partnerships with educational and support platforms to enhance user knowledge and assistance. The wallet's multi-wallet system and in-wallet features differentiate it in a competitive market. The presence of active social media channels and security audits further strengthens its market position. Revenue streams likely include token-related incentives and possibly partnerships or integrations within the blockchain ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a strong security posture with HTTPS enabled, open-source transparency, and third-party security audits. It avoids tracking users without consent, aligning with privacy best practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The missing WHOIS data is a concern but does not directly impact the technical security of the platform. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Temple Wallet

Description:

Temple Wallet is a secure, multichain Web3 wallet for Tezos, Etherlink, and Ethereum. Buy, swap, stake tokens, manage NFTs — all in one place.

Key Services:
Multi-wallet systemBuy, swap, stake tokensNFT managementRewards with native token $TKEYMobile and browser extension wallet
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle Fonts (Inter)jQuery 3.5.1WebFont Loader
Platforms:
Chrome Browser ExtensionMobile Android and iOS apps
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • Non-custodial wallet approach
  • Open source code for transparency
  • Security audits by Least Authority and Cossack Labs
  • No analytics tracking without user consent

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default0
Selector:google0
Selector:k10
Selector:k20
Selector:selector10
Selector:selector20
Selector:mail0
Selector:email0
Selector:dkim0
Selector:s10
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(305 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1757117051, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:75ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS with modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts. It is hosted on a CDN likely provided by Webflow, ensuring fast loading times and good performance. The site is fully responsive and optimized for mobile devices. SEO best practices are followed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No legacy or vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure supports multi-platform wallet access including browser extensions and mobile apps. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement cookie consent mechanisms to align with best practices.
Analyze Another Website