Skip to main content

Is tempo.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Tempo Reviews

T

Is tempo.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Tempo

Check if tempo.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptReactNext.js
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 1:02:10 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Tempo is a blockchain platform focused on providing a neutral, permissionless blockchain optimized for payment processing. The platform emphasizes efficient transactions with predictable low fees and stablecoin interoperability, targeting businesses and developers in the fintech and blockchain space. The website's market position is niche, focusing on payment solutions within the blockchain industry. Technically, the site is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as React and Next.js and is hosted on Vercel, indicating a contemporary infrastructure. However, the website currently returns a 404 error page, indicating incomplete or missing content, which severely impacts user experience and trust. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacking DNSSEC and security headers, and no visible privacy or security policies. Analytics usage is minimal and privacy-conscious, using Plausible Analytics. Overall, the site lacks critical content and compliance information, resulting in a low trust and quality score.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptReactNext.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Tempo operates in the blockchain technology sector with a focus on payment processing solutions. The business model revolves around providing blockchain infrastructure optimized for payments and stablecoin interoperability. The domain age and registration details align with a legitimate startup founded in 2017. The company targets fintech businesses and developers seeking efficient blockchain payment solutions. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The lack of contact information and policies suggests the website is either under development or poorly maintained, which could hinder growth and trust. The use of reputable hosting and registrar services indicates a professional approach to infrastructure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is low to moderate. HTTPS is enabled, which is mandatory, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are present. There are no visible privacy or security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of these elements represents compliance gaps and potential risks. The minimal analytics tracking reduces privacy concerns but also indicates limited user engagement data collection. The site’s 404 error page and lack of content further reduce its security posture as it may indicate incomplete deployment or maintenance issues.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Tempo

Description:

A neutral, permissionless blockchain optimized for payment processing, enabling efficient transactions with predictable low fees and stablecoin interoperability.

Key Services:
Blockchain payment processingStablecoin interoperabilityEfficient transactions with low fees
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptReactNext.js
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Platforms:
Vercel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Plausible Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
plausible.io
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website currently returns a 404 error page indicating missing or incomplete content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:email(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:dkim(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2254 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:216.150.1.1
Name Servers:
ariella.ns.cloudflare.com
konnor.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382513724, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:102ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with React and Next.js frameworks and is hosted on Vercel, which supports fast and scalable deployments. However, the site currently returns a 404 error page indicating missing content, which severely impacts usability and SEO. Meta tags and Open Graph tags are present but cannot compensate for the lack of actual content. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are basic but limited by the absence of content. No CMS is detected. The site uses Plausible Analytics, a privacy-focused analytics tool, which is a positive aspect. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but underutilized due to incomplete content and missing security best practices.
Analyze Another Website