Skip to main content

Is tenter.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Tenter Reviews

tenter.lv favicon

Is tenter.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Tenter

Check if tenter.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
JavaScriptCSSHTMLGoogle FontsLite YouTube Embed+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:32:39 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Tenter is a Latvian manufacturing company specializing in roof trusses, serving primarily the construction and building sector within Latvia. The website presents a professional and focused business offering roof structure production services. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Breakdance, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and has good content quality, but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers or vulnerability disclosures, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTMLGoogle FontsLite YouTube EmbedSwiper.jsLightGallery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Tenter operates as a small manufacturing business focused on roof truss production in Latvia. Its market position is local with a clear target audience of construction professionals and property developers. The business model is B2B manufacturing with no evident subsidiaries or parent companies. The website content is consistent and well-branded, supporting the company’s market presence. However, the absence of contact details and compliance policies online may limit customer trust and regulatory adherence. There is no evidence of partnerships or extended ecosystem domains from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

6*****@tenter.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is presumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. The absence of WHOIS data restricts domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvement in compliance and security best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Tenter

Description:

Tenter is a Latvian company specializing in the manufacturing of roof trusses (jumta kopnes). They offer production services for roof structures within Latvia.

Key Services:
Roof truss manufacturingRoof structure production
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTMLGoogle FontsLite YouTube EmbedSwiper.jsLightGallery
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com a:directo.gate.ee include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-westeu.emailsignatures365.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 26 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:85.194.202.135
Name Servers:
ns.elkdata.eeDNS only
ns2.elkdata.eeDNS only
ns3.elkdata.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: tenter-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025020600, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:124ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com a:directo.gate.ee include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-westeu.emailsignatures365.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Breakdance for page building. It uses Google Fonts and JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and LightGallery for UI components. The site appears mobile-optimized and has a good design quality. Performance is moderate, with some deferred and lazy-loaded scripts. Accessibility features are basic but could be improved. No analytics or tracking tools were detected, which simplifies privacy but limits marketing insights. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website