Skip to main content

Is teplokoprivnice.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - TEPLO Kopřivnice s.r.o. Reviews

T

Is teplokoprivnice.cz Safe? Security Analysis for TEPLO Kopřivnice s.r.o.

Check if teplokoprivnice.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyCzech Republicsmall
WordPressjQueryLightbox Plus Colorbox
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 7:00:08 PM
37
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

TEPLO Kopřivnice s.r.o. is a local energy supplier providing heat to end customers in the city of Kopřivnice, Czech Republic. The company focuses on heat supply services and regularly updates customers on pricing, supply interruptions, and regulatory compliance. The website reflects a small-sized business with a clear local market focus and consistent branding. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as jQuery and Lightbox, offering moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, though the website content appears professional and trustworthy. Overall, the site is functional and informative but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryLightbox Plus Colorbox

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the energy sector, specifically heat supply, targeting residential and commercial customers in Kopřivnice. Its business model revolves around regulated heat delivery and pricing, with compliance to Czech energy regulations. The website content indicates active communication with customers and regulatory bodies, suggesting a stable local market position. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company appears to maintain a straightforward operational model with limited digital marketing or analytics integration. Growth indicators or revenue streams are not disclosed on the site.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

j*****@teplokoprivnice.cz

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, protecting data in transit. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are published, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The site does not collect sensitive user data via forms, reducing exposure risk. Regular updates and patching of WordPress and plugins are recommended to prevent exploitation. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no GDPR-related documentation or cookie consent mechanisms detected.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

TEPLO Kopřivnice s.r.o.

Description:

Společnost TEPLO Kopřivnice s.r.o je dodavatelem tepla pro koncové zákazníky na území města Kopřivnice.

Key Services:
Heat supplyInformation on heat pricingCustomer communication regarding heat supply interruptions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryLightbox Plus Colorbox
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:185.163.40.135
Name Servers:
miramo1.miramo.cz
miramo3.miramo.cz
ns.ktknet.cz
MX Records:
10: ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
1: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 2021080101, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:29ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery and Lightbox Plus Colorbox for UI enhancements. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags and character encoding. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization detected. Mobile optimization is basic, lacking advanced responsive design features. Accessibility features are minimal but present. SEO optimization is basic, with standard meta tags but no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags found. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. No advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress and common JavaScript libraries are detected.
Analyze Another Website