Skip to main content

Is tervetefood.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Agrolats Group Reviews

tervetefood.lv favicon

Is tervetefood.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Agrolats Group

Check if tervetefood.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
jQueryFont AwesomeOxygen BuilderRevolution SliderWPML CMS Navigation
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:57:21 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website represents Druvas Saldējums, an ice cream brand under the Agrolats Group, targeting consumers in Latvia. The business appears to focus on food manufacturing and retail, with a regional market presence. The website is built on WordPress using common plugins and libraries, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Security posture is average with no visible security headers or policies, and privacy compliance is poor due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional but lacks comprehensive compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

jQueryFont AwesomeOxygen BuilderRevolution SliderWPML CMS Navigation

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Druvas Saldējums operates within the retail food sector, specifically ice cream production and distribution. The business model is likely direct-to-consumer and wholesale within Latvia. The website branding is moderately consistent, but lacks detailed business and contact information. The presence of Facebook Pixel suggests some marketing efforts. The lack of privacy and security policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and common JavaScript libraries but lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS. No forms or input fields were detected that collect sensitive data, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of privacy and incident response policies indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The use of Facebook Pixel introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhanced headers, policy disclosures, and incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Agrolats Group

Description:

The website represents Druvas Saldējums (Druva Ice-Cream), a brand under Tērvete food and Agrolats Group, likely involved in food production or distribution, specifically ice cream products.

Key Services:
Ice cream productionFood product distribution
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryFont AwesomeOxygen BuilderRevolution SliderWPML CMS Navigation
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:80.233.160.187 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:tervetefood.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:35.214.233.230
Name Servers:
ns1.siteground.netDNS only
ns2.siteground.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.hld.lv
SOA:Serial: 100145, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:242ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:80.233.160.187 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:tervetefood.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with Oxygen Builder and Revolution Slider plugins, using jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements. External resources are loaded from reputable CDNs. The site appears mobile responsive with basic SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no major errors detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The lack of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies suggests a straightforward technical infrastructure suitable for a small to medium-sized business.
Analyze Another Website