Skip to main content

Is tgf.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - TGF Build Reviews

T

Is tgf.lv Safe? Security Analysis for TGF Build

Check if tgf.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatviasmall
Next.jsReactGoogle Tag ManagerLucide Icons
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:39:13 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

TGF Build is a Latvian-based company specializing in electrical installation and general construction services, offering a full project cycle from design to commissioning. The company targets local businesses and property owners, emphasizing quality and client satisfaction with over 10 years of experience. Their website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. The technical infrastructure includes Google Tag Manager for analytics, but lacks visible security headers and privacy policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The security evaluation shows a solid SSL configuration and no visible vulnerabilities, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies and WHOIS transparency slightly reduce trust. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and credible, but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactGoogle Tag ManagerLucide Icons

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the energy and construction sectors, providing services such as site inspections, external electrical supply, internal and external electrical networks, access control systems, and maintenance of electrical installations. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored solutions to clients in Latvia. The website content and structured data indicate a small-sized enterprise with a consistent brand presence and multiple customer service contacts. The lack of WHOIS data transparency is a minor concern but likely due to privacy protection. The company appears well-positioned locally with a clear service offering and partnership ecosystem, as evidenced by displayed partner logos. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@tgf.lv

Phone Numbers (3)

+3712932****
+3712999****
+3712217****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The company should implement security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide incident response contacts to improve security culture and compliance. Regular audits of third-party scripts and monitoring for vulnerabilities are recommended to maintain security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

TGF Build

Description:

Elektromontāža un Vispārējā Būvniecība. Mēs piedāvājam pilnu ciklu pakalpojumus no projekta dizaina līdz komisijas pārbaudei.

Key Services:
Objektu apsekošanas darbiĀrējā elektroapgādeĀrējie un iekšējie elektriskie tīkliPieejas kontroles sistēmasĒku elektroinstalācijas sistēmu uzturēšana ekspluatācijas kārtībāProjektēšanas darbi
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactGoogle Tag ManagerLucide Icons
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:efdff10e@mxtoolbox.dmarc-report.com
Forensic Reports:efdff10e@forensics.dmarc-report.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:216.198.79.1
Name Servers:
ken.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
ruth.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.inbox.eu

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, contributing to good performance and SEO optimization. The use of Google Tag Manager facilitates analytics but requires privacy policy alignment. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses SVG icons for UI elements. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The technical stack is current and supports scalability, but technical debt may arise if security and compliance gaps are not addressed.
Analyze Another Website