Skip to main content

Is theconversation.com a Scam? Security Check Results - The Conversation Reviews

theconversation.com favicon

Is theconversation.com Safe? Security Analysis for The Conversation

Check if theconversation.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
React (Next.js)Didomi Consent ManagementGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsWebpack
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 3:36:13 AM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Conversation is a well-established media platform founded in 2003, specializing in publishing in-depth academic and research-based news and analysis. It targets academics, researchers, and the general public interested in informed commentary on global issues. The platform operates multiple regional editions, including Europe, and maintains a strong market position as a reputable source of scholarly journalism. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, integrates consent management via Didomi, and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear GDPR-aligned policies and consent banners. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and content quality, suitable for its academic and media audience.

Detected Technologies

React (Next.js)Didomi Consent ManagementGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsWebpack

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Conversation operates as a media publishing platform with a business model centered on delivering curated academic content and research news. Its competitive advantage lies in its editorial rigor and academic authorship, appealing to a niche audience valuing credible and research-backed information. Revenue streams likely include advertising, sponsored content, and newsletter subscriptions. The platform's partnership ecosystem includes social media channels such as Facebook for content distribution. Growth indicators include multiple regional editions and a large content repository. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance security transparency and incident response readiness to further strengthen trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a publicly available security policy or incident response contacts indicates areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Didomi is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy may limit external security engagement. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and DNS security.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Conversation

Description:

Curated by professional editors, The Conversation offers informed commentary and debate on the issues affecting our world. Plus a Plain English guide to the latest developments and discoveries from the university and research sector.

Key Services:
Publishing academic articlesCurated news and analysisNewsletter distribution
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React (Next.js)Didomi Consent ManagementGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsWebpack
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

82/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ip4:23.21.109.197 ip4:23.21.109.212 ip4:147.160.167.0/26 ip4:203.55.21.29 ip4:143.55.234.128 include:sendgrid.net include:helpscoutemail.com include:_spf.mlsend.com -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:re+ool1bh03yvv@inbound.dmarcdigests.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(263 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.2.132, 151.101.194.132, 151.101.130.132, 151.101.66.132
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsimple.com
ns1.dnsunlimited.com
ns2.dnsimple-edge.net
ns2.dnsunlimited.com
ns3.dnsimple.com
ns3.dnsunlimited.com
ns4.dnsimple-edge.org
ns4.dnsunlimited.com
ns5.dnsunlimited.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1427610218, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ip4:23.21.109.197 ip4:23.21.109.212 ip4:147.160.167.0/26 ip4:203.55.21.29 ip4:143.55.234.128 include:sendgrid.net include:helpscoutemail.com include:_spf.mlsend.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React and Next.js frameworks, enabling server-side rendering and optimized performance. It uses Didomi for consent management and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. The site demonstrates fast loading times, excellent mobile optimization, and good accessibility features. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS records show use of 1API GmbH as registrar and DNSimple/DNSUnlimited for DNS services. The site uses a custom or proprietary CMS, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Technical risks include the lack of DNSSEC and potential dependency on multiple third-party scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and well-maintained.
Analyze Another Website