Skip to main content

Is thefork.at a Scam? Security Check Results - TheFork Reviews

thefork.at favicon

Is thefork.at Safe? Security Analysis for TheFork

https://thefork.at

Check if thefork.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityAustrialarge
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerDataDome (bot protection)Stripe (payment processing)+1 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 7:10:35 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

TheFork is a prominent online restaurant reservation platform operating primarily in Austria and across Europe, offering consumers the ability to book tables at top restaurants with discounts and a loyalty points program. As a subsidiary of TripAdvisor, it holds a strong market position in the hospitality sector. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure leveraging React and Next.js frameworks, with integrations for bot protection (DataDome), payment processing (Stripe), and cookie consent management (Evidon). Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, although explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not publicly linked, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, with active social media presence and clear branding.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerDataDome (bot protection)Stripe (payment processing)Evidon (cookie consent)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

TheFork's business model centers on facilitating restaurant reservations with added value through discounts and loyalty rewards, targeting consumers seeking dining experiences in Austria and Europe. Its affiliation with TripAdvisor enhances credibility and market reach. The platform likely generates revenue via commissions from restaurants and possibly premium listings or advertising. The presence of bot protection and payment integration indicates a mature operational environment. However, the absence of publicly accessible privacy and terms policies and direct contact details may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. The company maintains active social media channels, supporting customer engagement and brand visibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (5)

s*****@thefork.at
v*****@thefork.at
f*****@thefork.at
k*****@thefork.at
i*****@thefork.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

TheFork exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The use of DataDome for bot mitigation and Evidon for cookie consent reflects attention to security and privacy best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of published security policies or incident response information limits transparency. The site should enhance accessibility features and provide clear security contact channels to improve incident handling readiness and user confidence.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main site.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

TheFork

Description:

Reserviere bei den besten Restaurants in Österreich und ganz Europa mit bis zu 50% Rabatt. Sammle Treuepunkte und werde Teil der TheFork Community

Key Services:
Restaurant reservationsDiscount dealsLoyalty points program
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerDataDome (bot protection)Stripe (payment processing)Evidon (cookie consent)
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Bot protection via DataDome
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Evidon
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.lafourchette.com
DNS Lookups:0/10
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@tripadvisor.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.66.132, 151.101.2.132, 151.101.130.132, 151.101.194.132
Name Servers:
ns-1461.awsdns-54.orgDNS only
ns-1640.awsdns-13.co.ukDNS only
ns-455.awsdns-56.comDNS only
ns-819.awsdns-38.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:17ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.lafourchette.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

TheFork's website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO performance. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Stripe, and DataDome indicates a sophisticated ecosystem for analytics, payments, and security. The site uses Evidon scripts for cookie consent, supporting GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with preconnect hints and font optimizations. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility could be improved. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Hosting provider details were not identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a scalable and secure user experience.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about thefork.at

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website