Skip to main content

Is thefork.be a Scam? Security Check Results - thefork.be Reviews

T

Is thefork.be Safe? Security Analysis for thefork.be

https://thefork.be

Check if thefork.be is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityBelgium
captcha-delivery.com script
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 7:10:55 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website thefork.be is currently inaccessible due to a CAPTCHA challenge page indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or bot protection mechanism. This prevents direct access to the site's content and limits the ability to perform a full security and compliance analysis. The domain is registered since 2014 with a reputable registrar, suggesting an established presence. The domain name and URL imply a hospitality or restaurant reservation service, but no explicit business information or metadata is available in the provided content. The technical infrastructure includes third-party CAPTCHA services to mitigate automated access. Due to the content block, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, nor are contact details or social media links. Security posture cannot be fully assessed but the presence of bot protection is a positive indicator. Overall, the site requires manual review with access beyond the WAF to provide a comprehensive evaluation.

Detected Technologies

captcha-delivery.com script

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Based on the domain and limited data, thefork.be likely operates in the hospitality sector, possibly offering restaurant reservations or related services. The domain age supports a mature business. However, no direct business descriptions, contact information, or certifications are found in the accessible content. The lack of visible marketing or analytics tools suggests minimal public-facing tracking or advertising in the blocked content. The business model and market positioning remain unclear due to content inaccessibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs a CAPTCHA challenge indicating an active security measure against automated threats. However, no security headers or policies are visible in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. The security posture appears minimal but with basic bot protection in place. Further analysis requires access beyond the WAF.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Provide publicly accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The HTML content is a CAPTCHA challenge page served by captcha-delivery.com indicating a WAF or bot protection mechanism blocking direct content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

No explicit business description found in the provided content. The domain name and URL suggest a restaurant reservation or hospitality-related service.

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
captcha-delivery.com script

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a CAPTCHA challenge, preventing full content analysis.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.lafourchette.com
DNS Lookups:0/10
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@tripadvisor.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.2.132, 151.101.66.132, 151.101.194.132, 151.101.130.132
Name Servers:
ns-1461.awsdns-54.orgDNS only
ns-1640.awsdns-13.co.ukDNS only
ns-455.awsdns-56.comDNS only
ns-819.awsdns-38.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:99ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.lafourchette.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a CAPTCHA challenge page from a third-party provider, indicating use of bot mitigation technology. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the provided content. The hosting provider is unknown. The site lacks visible metadata, structured data, or SEO optimizations in the accessible content. Performance, accessibility, and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to content block. The technical stack appears minimal with reliance on external CAPTCHA services.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about thefork.be

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website