Skip to main content

Is thefork.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - thefork.ch Reviews

T

Is thefork.ch Safe? Security Analysis for thefork.ch

https://thefork.ch

Check if thefork.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherSwitzerlandsmall
captcha-delivery.com script
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 7:10:34 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website thefork.ch is currently inaccessible due to a CAPTCHA challenge implemented via an external bot mitigation service (captcha-delivery.com). This prevents retrieval of actual site content, metadata, or business information. The visible page contains only minimal HTML with embedded CAPTCHA iframe, indicating a WAF or security layer blocking automated access. Due to this, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, nor are any contact details or company information. The technical infrastructure appears to include third-party CAPTCHA services but lacks visible security headers or SSL configuration details. Overall, the site’s security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of bot mitigation indicates some level of security awareness. The lack of accessible content and policies limits trust and compliance evaluation.

Detected Technologies

captcha-delivery.com script

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the content being blocked by a CAPTCHA challenge, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the site content. The domain thefork.ch suggests a possible connection to TheFork brand, known for restaurant reservations, but no explicit business data or partnerships are visible. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS data is typical for commercial entities. Without accessible content, insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments cannot be determined.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs a bot mitigation CAPTCHA service, which is a positive security control to prevent automated abuse. However, no security headers or SSL details are visible in the provided data. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating potential compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent. The security score is low due to inaccessible content and lack of visible security best practices. The CAPTCHA challenge itself may impact user experience and SEO negatively if not properly managed.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Ensure the CAPTCHA challenge does not block legitimate users or search engine crawlers to improve accessibility and SEO.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page content is a CAPTCHA challenge served via geo.captcha-delivery.com iframe indicating WAF or bot protection blocking access to actual content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
captcha-delivery.com script
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a CAPTCHA challenge, preventing access to actual site content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.lafourchette.com
DNS Lookups:0/10
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@tripadvisor.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.130.132, 151.101.66.132, 151.101.2.132, 151.101.194.132
Name Servers:
ns-1461.awsdns-54.orgDNS only
ns-1640.awsdns-13.co.ukDNS only
ns-455.awsdns-56.comDNS only
ns-819.awsdns-38.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:54ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.lafourchette.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site’s technical footprint is minimal in the accessible content, showing only scripts related to captcha-delivery.com for bot mitigation. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. The HTML is minimal and lacks metadata or structured data. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but appear basic. The CAPTCHA iframe occupies the full viewport, indicating a blocking mechanism rather than normal site content. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not visible. The site would benefit from improved metadata, SEO tags, and accessibility features once content is accessible.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about thefork.ch

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website