Skip to main content

Is thefork.de a Scam? Security Check Results - thefork.de Reviews

T

Is thefork.de Safe? Security Analysis for thefork.de

https://thefork.de

Check if thefork.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Cloudflare CAPTCHADataDome CAPTCHA
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 8:21:00 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website thefork.de is currently inaccessible due to a CAPTCHA challenge implemented by DataDome, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or bot protection mechanism. This prevents access to any meaningful content, metadata, or business information on the site. The domain uses Amazon AWS DNS servers, which is typical for legitimate businesses, but no registrant details are available to verify ownership or business claims. Due to the blocked content, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, and no contact information or security policies are visible. The security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of a CAPTCHA suggests an intent to protect against automated threats. Overall, the site cannot be properly evaluated for content quality, technical implementation, or compliance at this time.

Detected Technologies

Cloudflare CAPTCHADataDome CAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears professionally hosted on AWS infrastructure, which suggests a legitimate business presence. However, no information about market positioning, business model, or services is available from the provided data. No partner or subsidiary domains are identified. The absence of visible contact or policy information limits assessment of business credibility and customer engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is indeterminate due to the CAPTCHA blocking access. The use of DataDome CAPTCHA indicates an active defense against bots and automated attacks, which is a positive security measure. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details are available for review. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are also absent, limiting the ability to assess readiness and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Provide a publicly accessible version of the website or a staging environment for security and compliance audits.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is blocked by a CAPTCHA security mechanism (DataDome CAPTCHA) indicating a WAF or bot protection in place.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Cloudflare CAPTCHADataDome CAPTCHA

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to CAPTCHA challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.lafourchette.com
DNS Lookups:0/10
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@tripadvisor.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.194.132, 151.101.2.132, 151.101.66.132, 151.101.130.132
Name Servers:
ns-1461.awsdns-54.org
ns-1640.awsdns-13.co.uk
ns-455.awsdns-56.com
ns-819.awsdns-38.net
MX Records:
10: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.lafourchette.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is protected by DataDome CAPTCHA, which blocks automated access and likely legitimate crawlers, limiting technical analysis. The domain uses Amazon AWS DNS servers, indicating professional hosting infrastructure. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics tools are detectable from the provided HTML snippet. Performance, SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site currently exhibits technical debt in terms of accessibility and transparency due to blocking mechanisms and missing policies.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about thefork.de

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website