Skip to main content

Is thefrontproject.org.au a Scam? Security Check Results - The Front Project Reviews

thefrontproject.org.au favicon

Is thefrontproject.org.au Safe? Security Analysis for The Front Project

Check if thefrontproject.org.au is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationAustraliamedium
Joomla CMS 5.3.3Bootstrap 5.3.3jQuery 3.7.1LayerSliderFontAwesome 6.7.2+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:55:54 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Front Project is a national Australian non-profit enterprise dedicated to improving early childhood education through advocacy, research, and fellowship programs. The organization positions itself as a leader in systems change within the early education sector, targeting educators, policymakers, and community stakeholders. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear messaging about its mission and programs. Technically, the site is built on Joomla CMS with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. While the site uses HTTPS and shows no exposed sensitive data, it lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided content. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid business credibility and technical foundation but would benefit from improved privacy and security policy transparency.

Detected Technologies

Joomla CMS 5.3.3Bootstrap 5.3.3jQuery 3.7.1LayerSliderFontAwesome 6.7.2AwesompleteGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Front Project operates in the education and non-profit sectors, focusing on early childhood education reform in Australia. Its business model centers on collaborative advocacy, research dissemination, and leadership development through the Apiary Fellowship. The organization leverages digital platforms to engage stakeholders and disseminate resources. The presence on major social media platforms supports outreach and community engagement. The lack of explicit privacy and security policies may reflect an area for organizational growth in compliance maturity. The domain registration data is consistent with the organization's Australian focus, enhancing trustworthiness. No direct revenue streams or commercial partnerships were identified in the provided data, consistent with a non-profit model.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. The site uses CSRF tokens in forms, which is a positive security practice. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness visibility. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance efforts. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Front Project

Description:

The Front Project is a national enterprise working to create positive change in Australia’s early childhood education system. It works collaboratively to improve early education access, experiences and outcomes for children across Australia.

Key Services:
Research and policy developmentThe Apiary Fellowship programSystems change initiativesResource provision and advocacy
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla CMS 5.3.3Bootstrap 5.3.3jQuery 3.7.1LayerSliderFontAwesome 6.7.2AwesompleteGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens in forms

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured using Joomla CMS

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.salesforce.com ip4:27.131.109.98 include:spf.mtaroutes.com include:spf1.formassembly.com -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:27.131.111.162
Name Servers:
ns1.systemdns.com
ns2.systemdns.com
ns3.systemdns.com
MX Records:
10: mx1.mtaroutes.com
20: mx2.mtaroutes.com
30: mx3.mtaroutes.com
40: mx4.mtaroutes.com
SOA:Serial: 1745823337, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:185ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.salesforce.com ip4:27.131.109.98 include:spf.mtaroutes.com include:spf1.formassembly.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Joomla CMS version 5.3.3, utilizing Bootstrap 5.3.3 for responsive design and jQuery 3.7.1 for client-side scripting. It integrates LayerSlider for interactive content and FontAwesome 6.7.2 for iconography. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of modern web fonts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting details are not explicit, but the domain is registered via Tucows/OpenSRS in Australia. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the organization's needs, though security enhancements are recommended.
Analyze Another Website