Skip to main content

Is thegraph.com a Scam? Security Check Results - The Graph Reviews

thegraph.com favicon

Is thegraph.com Safe? Security Analysis for The Graph

Check if thegraph.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
React (implied by _next/static chunks)Next.jsCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 2:03:02 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Graph is a technology company specializing in blockchain data indexing and accessibility through GraphQL APIs. It serves developers and blockchain users by providing a protocol that organizes blockchain data efficiently. The company has a mature domain registered since 2004, indicating a stable presence in the technology sector. The website is professionally designed using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, ensuring good performance and security. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and publishing security policies. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and compliance disclosures.

Detected Technologies

React (implied by _next/static chunks)Next.jsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Graph operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on data indexing and query services. Its business model revolves around providing a decentralized protocol that enables developers to access blockchain data via GraphQL. The company targets blockchain developers and enterprises requiring efficient data access. The domain age and consistent branding support a credible market position. The absence of detailed business contact information and compliance policies suggests an opportunity to improve transparency. The company likely generates revenue through protocol usage and developer services. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified in the provided data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, preventing unauthorized transfers. DNS is managed by Cloudflare, a reputable provider, though DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended enhancement. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no public security policy or incident response information, which are best practices for transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits the ability for external security researchers to report issues. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional transparency and DNS security features.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Graph

Description:

The Graph is an indexing protocol for organizing blockchain data and making it easily accessible with GraphQL.

Key Services:
Indexing blockchain dataProviding GraphQL APIs for blockchain data access
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React (implied by _next/static chunks)Next.jsCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:e9174152edb945f1ae8fa5e02a8b1629@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:thegraph.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/25/2025 (80 days)
SANs:thegraph.com, *.thegraph.com, *.staging.network.thegraph.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(168 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.40.31, 172.64.147.225
AAAA Records:2606:4700:4406::ac40:93e1, 2a06:98c1:3109::6812:281f
Name Servers:
joel.ns.cloudflare.com
veda.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
40: aspmx2.googlemail.com
50: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2382313109, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, which supports performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and preloaded CSS. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from additional security headers and privacy compliance features.
Analyze Another Website