Skip to main content

Is thenai.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Network Advertising Initiative Reviews

thenai.org favicon

Is thenai.org Safe? Security Analysis for Network Advertising Initiative

Check if thenai.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerAddToAny sharing plugin+1 more
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 12:30:23 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Network Advertising Initiative (NAI) operates as an industry trade group focused on developing self-regulatory standards for online advertising. Founded in 2000, it serves as a key player in the digital advertising ecosystem, promoting transparency and consumer control over tailored advertising. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence, targeting industry members and consumers interested in advertising privacy. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting is via Amazon AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and moderate loading speeds. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies on the main site, which could be improved to meet GDPR and other regulatory standards. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned within its niche but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy disclosures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerAddToAny sharing pluginjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

NAI holds a significant position as a self-regulatory body within the online advertising industry, providing standards and opt-out mechanisms that benefit both advertisers and consumers. Its business model revolves around membership services, policy advocacy, and industry collaboration. The presence of working groups and membership benefits indicates an active engagement with stakeholders. The partnership with naisummit.org suggests involvement in industry events and thought leadership. The organization targets advertisers, publishers, and consumers seeking transparency in digital advertising. Growth indicators include ongoing policy updates and a maintained web presence with modern technologies. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled communication approach, likely via contact forms or member portals.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer restrictions in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents areas for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could hinder timely security communications. The use of common third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces moderate tracking but no evident vulnerabilities. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated libraries based on the provided information. Enhancing security headers and publishing clear security policies would strengthen the overall security maturity and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Network Advertising Initiative

Description:

The Network Advertising Initiative is an industry trade group founded in 2000 that develops self-regulatory standards for online advertising.

Key Services:
Development of self-regulatory standards for online advertisingProviding opt-out mechanisms for consumersPolicy updates and advocacyMembership benefits and working groups
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerAddToAny sharing pluginjQuery
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
AddToAny
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:46502962.spf01.hubspotemail.net include:relay.mailchannels.net a -all google-site-verification=DqrObmP-Gh5hLMnwhUPGa9UJgRx4R93Juax3ytJeNMs v=spf1 include:46502962.spf01.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.10, 141.193.213.11
Name Servers:
ns-1275.awsdns-31.orgDNS only
ns-1542.awsdns-00.co.ukDNS only
ns-172.awsdns-21.comDNS only
ns-650.awsdns-17.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, leveraging Yoast SEO for search optimization and AddToAny for social sharing. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user behavior tracking. Hosting is managed via Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure, indicating a reliable backend. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries including jQuery. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected in the HTML structure. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site could benefit from further technical enhancements such as improved security headers and advanced caching or CDN usage to boost speed and security.
Analyze Another Website