Skip to main content

Is theufl.com a Scam? Security Check Results - The UFL Reviews

T

Is theufl.com Safe? Security Analysis for The UFL

Check if theufl.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
Vue.js (Nuxt.js framework)Tailwind CSSGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:25:07 AM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The UFL website serves as an information hub for the United Football League, providing schedules, team details, news, standings, and statistics to football fans and followers of the USFL and XFL conferences. The site also supports e-commerce through a linked merchandise shop and ticket sales, targeting sports enthusiasts and league supporters. The business model centers on media content delivery and fan engagement within the niche sports league market. Technically, the site employs modern frontend technologies including Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good design and navigation clarity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a significant concern, impacting the trustworthiness and legitimacy perception of the site. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration and enhanced privacy and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Vue.js (Nuxt.js framework)Tailwind CSSGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The UFL operates in the media and sports sector, focusing on niche American football leagues including USFL and XFL conferences. Its competitive advantage lies in providing centralized, official league information and fan services such as schedules, stats, and merchandise. Revenue streams likely include advertising, ticket sales, and merchandise sales via the partner shop domain. The target customer segment is sports fans and football enthusiasts interested in spring football leagues. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of digital marketing tools. The partnership ecosystem includes e-commerce platforms and advertising networks. Strategic observations suggest the need for stronger domain legitimacy and enhanced privacy compliance to build greater trust with users and partners.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

0*****@sentry.wmt.dev

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism detected despite tracking scripts. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site content. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential risk. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with enhanced policies, headers, and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The UFL

Description:

The UFL website provides information about the United Football League, including schedules, teams, news, standings, stats, and promotional content. It targets fans and followers of the league and its teams.

Key Services:
League schedulesTeam informationNews updatesStatisticsTicket salesMerchandise shop
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Vue.js (Nuxt.js framework)Tailwind CSSGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Frameworks:
Nuxt.jsVue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ad Manager
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=28800"

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "origin-when-cross-origin"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.redpoints.com ip4:38.133.153.128/26 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:spam@theufl.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(391 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.8.220.10
Name Servers:
ns-1028.awsdns-00.org
ns-1615.awsdns-09.co.uk
ns-466.awsdns-58.com
ns-676.awsdns-20.net
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:254ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.redpoints.com ip4:38.133.153.128/26 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern frontend technologies, primarily Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework) and Tailwind CSS for styling. It leverages Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive and demonstrates good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images and modular JavaScript. No common CMS was detected, indicating a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing domain registration data, which could impact operational trust and security posture. Opportunities exist to enhance performance and security through best practices and transparency.
Analyze Another Website