Skip to main content

Is thinkdesignblog.com a Scam? Security Check Results - thinkdesignblog.com Reviews

T

Is thinkdesignblog.com Safe? Security Analysis for My Blog – My WordPress Blog

Check if thinkdesignblog.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
WordPress 6.8.2PHP (implied)JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:37:20 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

ThinkDesignBlog.com is a small personal or generic WordPress blog established in 2008, currently hosting minimal content with a default 'Hello world!' post. The website targets a general audience with no specific business model or industry focus evident. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress 6.8.2, hosted on Namecheap servers, and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism indicating some awareness of GDPR compliance, but lacks a privacy policy, terms of service, and contact information, which limits its business credibility and privacy compliance posture. Security measures are basic, with no DNSSEC or security headers detected, representing potential areas for improvement.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2PHP (implied)JavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website appears to be a personal or hobby blog with no clear commercial intent or business information. It lacks detailed business descriptions, contact details, or trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. The social media presence is limited to generic links to Instagram, Facebook, and X without specific company accounts. The domain age is consistent with a long-standing blog, but the lack of business data suggests limited market positioning or revenue streams. No partnerships or related domains were identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate due to the presence of HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security maturity. No incident response or security policies are published on the site. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing additional security best practices and transparency around data protection.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

A personal or generic WordPress blog with minimal content, currently only a default 'Hello world!' post.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2PHP (implied)JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a basic WordPress blog with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:162.0.235.233 include:spf.web-hosting.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(402 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:162.0.235.235
Name Servers:
dns1.namecheaphosting.com
dns2.namecheaphosting.com
MX Records:
5: mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems
10: mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems
20: mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems
SOA:Serial: 1740226920, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:155ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:162.0.235.233 include:spf.web-hosting.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS with version 6.8.2, leveraging common web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. Hosting is provided by Namecheap as indicated by the nameservers. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and modern security headers. There is no evidence of analytics or advertising scripts, indicating minimal tracking and marketing infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation is basic but functional for a small blog.
Analyze Another Website