Skip to main content

Is tiklot.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - tiklot.lv Reviews

tiklot.lv favicon

Is tiklot.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Tiklot.lv

Check if tiklot.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:21:52 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website tiklot.lv is a WordPress-based site using the Divi theme, but it currently contains minimal content and lacks critical business and security information. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents verification of domain registration details, which limits trust assessment. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as JavaScript, jQuery, and Google Fonts, but lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, and security features. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or business credentials are provided, which diminishes business credibility. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS confirmation and missing security headers. Overall, the site appears underdeveloped or possibly a placeholder, with low trustworthiness and limited user engagement features.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of substantive content and absence of business details, it is difficult to ascertain the market positioning or business model of tiklot.lv. No information about company size, sector, or services is available. The site does not display any trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. No partnerships or related domains are identified. The minimal digital footprint suggests a small or nascent business presence with limited online engagement or marketing efforts.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@tiklot.lv
i*****@tiklot.lvVietne

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of tiklot.lv is currently weak. The site does not demonstrate the use of HTTPS or security headers, and no security policies or incident response contacts are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. These gaps expose the site to potential risks and reduce user trust. Immediate improvements in SSL implementation, security headers, and privacy compliance are recommended.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
Divi Theme
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:68.183.219.101
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.zoho.eu
20: mx2.zoho.eu
30: mx3.zoho.eu
SOA:Serial: 1744890894, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:120ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with standard JavaScript and jQuery libraries and Google Fonts integration. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features. Performance appears moderate but could not be fully assessed due to limited content. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, indicating minimal tracking or user behavior analysis. The technical infrastructure is basic and would benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations to support business growth and compliance.
Analyze Another Website