Skip to main content

Is tiktokshop.com a Scam? Security Check Results - tiktokshop.com Reviews

T

Is tiktokshop.com Safe? Security Analysis for tiktokshop.com

Check if tiktokshop.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
ReactAxiosLodashArco DesignPolyfill
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 9:24:53 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The analyzed URL https://shop.tiktok.com/business is a subdomain of tiktok.com but currently returns a 404 error page with minimal content, indicating the page is either not available or under construction. There is no visible business information, contact details, or user-facing content to assess the business model or market position. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript libraries such as React and Axios, suggesting a contemporary web application framework, but the lack of content limits further evaluation. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or privacy policies, and the SSL configuration is basic. Overall, the website presence at this URL is not established, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.

Detected Technologies

ReactAxiosLodashArco DesignPolyfill

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of content and business information on the page, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain is a subdomain of TikTok, a major technology and social media company, but this specific subdomain does not provide any visible services or information. No partnerships, certifications, or market positioning data are available from the page.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to the lack of security headers and privacy compliance indicators. The site uses HTTPS but no advanced security configurations are evident. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities are directly observable, but the lack of security best practices reduces overall security confidence.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish meaningful content or redirect users to an active page to avoid 404 errors.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

None Detected

Website returns a minimal 404 page with no content, indicating the page is not accessible or does not exist. No WAF challenge detected but content is effectively blocked or unavailable.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactAxiosLodashArco DesignPolyfill
Frameworks:
React
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

The URL https://shop.tiktok.com/business returns a 404 error page with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

87/100
Score

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.bytedance.com include:mail.stibee.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:tiktok@rua.agari.com
Forensic Reports:tiktok@ruf.agari.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:23.213.161.212, 23.213.161.197, 23.213.161.221, 23.213.161.203, 23.213.161.196, 23.213.161.209, 23.213.161.198, 23.213.161.223
Name Servers:
a1-97.akam.netDNS only
a12-66.akam.netDNS only
a13-67.akam.netDNS only
a18-64.akam.netDNS only
a6-65.akam.netDNS only
a9-66.akam.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx1.tiktok.com
20: mx2.tiktok.com
30: mx3.tiktok.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses a modern React-based frontend with libraries such as Axios for HTTP requests and Lodash for utility functions. The presence of Arco Design components indicates use of a UI framework. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate given the minimal content, but SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of metadata and content. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level. Technical debt cannot be assessed due to lack of content.
Analyze Another Website