Skip to main content

Is timomurene.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - timomurene.eu Reviews

T

Is timomurene.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if timomurene.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSS ResetJavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:59:15 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at timomurene.eu is currently serving as a security challenge page powered by BitNinja, designed to prevent automated or malicious access by requiring visitors to complete a CAPTCHA validation. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or bot mitigation service, limiting access to legitimate users only. The page does not provide any business or product information, and no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present. The technical infrastructure includes Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics scripts, with legacy CMS meta tags suggesting Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, likely remnants or placeholders rather than active platforms. The security posture shows some strengths in bot mitigation but lacks modern security headers and explicit SSL configuration details. Overall, the site is functional as a security checkpoint but lacks content and compliance features necessary for a full business website.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS ResetJavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security platform

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the nature of the page as a security challenge, no direct business intelligence can be derived about the company or its market positioning. The registrar, SIA AmberBit, is known for BitNinja security services, indicating the domain is used for security purposes rather than commercial business operations. No contact information, company details, or business model insights are available. The target audience is general internet users attempting to access the protected site. The lack of business content and policies limits the ability to assess competitive advantages or growth indicators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs Google reCAPTCHA v2 integrated with BitNinja's greylist IP management to mitigate automated threats and bots, which is a positive security measure. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security robustness. The mention of outdated CMS versions in meta tags could pose risks if those platforms are in use, though this is likely not the case. No SSL/TLS configuration details were provided, so HTTPS enforcement cannot be confirmed. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, indicating limited transparency in security operations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade or remove legacy CMS meta tags to avoid security confusion and potential vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The page is a security challenge page by BitNinja, requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed, indicating WAF or bot mitigation.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This website is a security challenge page designed to validate visitors via CAPTCHA to prevent automated or malicious access. It does not provide business or product information.

Key Services:
CAPTCHA validationIP greylist management
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS ResetJavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security platform
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation
  • IP greylist management via BitNinja

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a security CAPTCHA challenge page, not a business or content site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.1TLSv1.2

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.149.219.49
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: timomurene.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025062000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:558ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a basic HTML5 structure with CSS reset styles and JavaScript for language translation and CAPTCHA integration. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts are present for tracking purposes. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. The presence of BitNinja branding and integration indicates the site is part of a security infrastructure rather than a content or business platform. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics and CAPTCHA scripts. The technical debt is low given the limited scope of the page, but modernization opportunities exist in updating CMS references and improving security headers.
Analyze Another Website