Skip to main content

Is tingyun.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 北京基调网络股份有限公司 Reviews

tingyun.com favicon

Is tingyun.com Safe? Security Analysis for 北京基调网络股份有限公司

Check if tingyun.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsBaidu AnalyticsYoast SEOFusion Builder+1 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 6:04:21 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

北京基调网络股份有限公司运营的基调听云网站是一家专注于应用性能管理(APM)、可观测性和应用安全的技术服务提供商。该公司通过其统一的可观测性平台和安全态势管理服务,帮助企业优化用户体验、提升研发运维效率并加速业务创新。网站内容丰富,涵盖多种解决方案和客户案例,体现其在行业中的领先地位。技术基础设施基于WordPress CMS,采用Avada主题和Fusion Builder插件,集成了百度和谷歌的分析工具,具备良好的移动优化和SEO表现。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,但缺少部分安全头和隐私政策,存在改进空间。WHOIS信息缺失,可能因隐私保护或注册异常,需关注域名注册的合法性和持续性。整体来看,网站专业且可信,但建议完善隐私合规和安全披露以提升信任度。

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsBaidu AnalyticsYoast SEOFusion BuilderWordPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

基调听云定位于企业级IT运维和安全市场,提供涵盖DevOps、业务运维、微服务治理、智能告警等多场景解决方案。其商业模式主要为SaaS及软件服务,目标客户为需要全链路监控和安全防护的中大型企业。网站展示了多个行业客户案例,涵盖金融、科技、制造业等,显示其广泛的市场覆盖和行业认可。通过持续发布专业博客和技术内容,增强市场影响力和客户粘性。缺乏公开的联系方式和隐私政策是潜在的客户信任障碍。整体业务生态成熟,具备较强的市场竞争力和成长潜力。

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站采用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,未发现明显的敏感信息泄露或易受攻击的库。使用异步加载脚本减少性能影响,但未配置安全相关HTTP头(如CSP、HSTS等),存在一定安全风险。缺少公开的安全政策和事件响应联系方式,可能影响安全事件处理效率。隐私和Cookie政策缺失,可能导致合规风险。建议加强安全头配置,完善隐私合规文档,并公开安全事件响应渠道以提升整体安全成熟度。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

完善并公开隐私政策和Cookie政策,确保GDPR等法规合规。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

北京基调网络股份有限公司

Description:

基调听云是Gartner认证的应用性能管理(APM)解决方案提供商,用户可通过基调听云产品实现具备可观测性(Observability)的全链路监控能力,并向智能运维(AIOps)迈进,帮助客户持续优化用户体验、提高研发运维效率和加快业务创新速率。

Key Services:
应用性能管理(APM)可观测性平台应用安全态势管理用户体验监控模拟综合监测数字化业务运维
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsBaidu AnalyticsYoast SEOFusion BuilderWordPress
Frameworks:
Avada ThemeFusion Builder
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async script loading

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsBaidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1153 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:58.87.82.180
Name Servers:
ns3.dnsv3.com
ns4.dnsv3.com
MX Records:
10: mxbiz2.qq.com
5: mxbiz1.qq.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于WordPress CMS,使用Avada主题和Fusion Builder构建,技术栈包含JavaScript及多种第三方分析脚本。页面设计专业,响应式布局良好,SEO优化到位。性能表现中等,加载了多个外部脚本和资源,可能影响加载速度。缺少部分安全头和隐私合规文档,存在技术和合规改进空间。整体技术架构适合企业级应用,但建议持续关注安全和隐私合规性,减少潜在风险。
Analyze Another Website