Skip to main content

Is tjghsnzp.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 中华医学网 Reviews

tjghsnzp.com favicon

Is tjghsnzp.com Safe? Security Analysis for 中华医学网

Check if tjghsnzp.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareChinamedium
BootstrapjQuery
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 2:02:43 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

中华医学网 is a Chinese-language online platform specializing in providing comprehensive information and services related to national medical licensing examinations, including registration, exam schedules, score queries, and exam preparation materials. The website targets medical professionals and candidates preparing for physician qualification exams in China, positioning itself as a specialized informational portal within the healthcare education sector. Technically, the site employs Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, delivering a moderately performant and mobile-optimized user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and serves its niche audience effectively, though enhancements in privacy compliance and security hardening are recommended.

Detected Technologies

BootstrapjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform operates as an important entity within the healthcare education sector in China, focusing on exam-related information dissemination. Its business model revolves around providing timely and relevant content for medical exam candidates, supported by regional subdomains catering to various provinces and cities. The presence of partner links to hospitals and educational resources suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The site’s content quality and professional presentation support moderate trustworthiness, though the use of privacy protection in WHOIS data and lack of detailed company registration information limit full transparency. The platform appears to be a medium-sized operation with a focused target audience and steady content updates.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

3*****@qq.com

Phone Numbers (1)

138*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, and no security certifications are indicated. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms also suggests partial non-compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR. While no critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and formalizing its security policies to enhance resilience and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

中华医学网

Description:

中华医学网提供2025年国家医师资格考试、国家执业医师考试网上报名、准考证打印、执业医师技能考试、历年真题、分数线及成绩查询服务。

Key Services:
医师资格考试报名考试资讯发布成绩查询准考证打印考试大纲及备考资料
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
BootstrapjQuery
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:103.41.80.38
Name Servers:
ns1.julydns.comDNS only
ns2.julydns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1751915032, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:319ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, providing a responsive and structured layout. The HTML is valid and meta tags are well defined for SEO purposes. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external scripts such as Baidu’s push.js for link submission. No modern CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, indicating a relatively straightforward technical infrastructure. Hosting details are not explicit, and no CDN usage was identified. The site is mobile optimized with viewport settings and responsive design elements. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve security configurations, and enhance accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website