Skip to main content

Is tkspmall.com a Scam? Security Check Results - tkspmall.com Reviews

tkspmall.com favicon

Is tkspmall.com Safe? Security Analysis for Global digital marketing services, social media account purchase, private residential IP Proxy - TKSPMALL

Check if tkspmall.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Identity ServicesElement UI (CSS framework)
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 7:34:25 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.tkspmall.com presents itself as a provider of global digital marketing services, social media account purchases, and private residential IP proxy services. The business model appears to be e-commerce oriented, targeting marketers and businesses requiring digital marketing and proxy solutions. The site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Element UI framework, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and lack of contact or privacy policies significantly undermine the trustworthiness and compliance posture of the site. Security headers and best practices are not evident, and no incident response or data protection officer information is provided, which raises concerns about security readiness. Overall, the site is functional but lacks critical transparency and compliance elements, posing moderate risk to users and partners.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Identity ServicesElement UI (CSS framework)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital marketing and proxy services. Its market positioning is unclear due to limited public information and lack of verifiable business credentials. The absence of contact details and privacy policies suggests a low level of business credibility and transparency. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates an intent to track user behavior for marketing optimization. No certifications or trust signals are present. The business likely targets small to medium enterprises or individual marketers seeking proxy and social media services. Growth indicators and partnerships are not disclosed, limiting insight into operational scale or ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low to moderate. The website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are found. The missing WHOIS data and absence of privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR and related regulations. The site does not demonstrate readiness for incident handling or data protection officer engagement. Tracking technologies are present but without clear privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvement to meet industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Offers global digital marketing services, social media account purchases, and private residential IP proxy services.

Key Services:
Digital marketing servicesSocial media account purchasePrivate residential IP Proxy
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Identity ServicesElement UI (CSS framework)
Frameworks:
Vue.js (implied by Element UI usage)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.privateemail.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1432-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:52.77.51.251
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.comDNS only
dns2.registrar-servers.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx1.privateemail.com
10: mx2.privateemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1752221681, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:376ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.privateemail.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks and UI libraries, notably Element UI and Vue.js components. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing analytics. The site appears mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. However, SEO optimization is minimal, and no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading or errors. The technical stack is adequate for the business model but lacks advanced features for accessibility, SEO, and security hardening. Technical debt is not clearly visible but the absence of compliance and security features suggests areas for modernization.
Analyze Another Website