Skip to main content

Is tkspstore.com a Scam? Security Check Results - tkspstore.com Reviews

tkspstore.com favicon

Is tkspstore.com Safe? Security Analysis for TKSPSTORE

Check if tkspstore.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Identity ServicesElement Plus UI Framework
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:15:14 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website TKSPSTORE appears to be an e-commerce or retail platform based on its title and UI framework usage. However, the site content is minimal and lacks substantive business descriptions, contact information, or policies. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript frameworks and Google services for analytics and identity management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is weak due to the absence of security headers, privacy policies, and WHOIS domain registration data, which raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents a low risk but requires significant improvements in transparency, compliance, and security to enhance credibility and user trust.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Identity ServicesElement Plus UI Framework

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of explicit business information, the market positioning and business model are unclear. The site likely targets general retail customers but does not provide clear services or company details. The absence of contact and policy pages limits the ability to assess revenue streams or partnerships. The use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics suggests an intent to track user behavior for marketing purposes. The business appears to be small-scale or in early development stages with limited online presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is low. No security headers or incident response contacts are present. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection without transparency. No GDPR compliance indicators or cookie consent mechanisms are found. The site uses HTTPS (implied by Google services), but SSL configuration details are unknown. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures or security certifications. The site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register and maintain clear WHOIS domain information to improve legitimacy and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Identity ServicesElement Plus UI Framework
Frameworks:
Vue.js (implied by Element Plus usage)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable, domain may not be registered or is newly registered.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.privateemail.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1432-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:tkspstore.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/16/2025 (74 days)
SANs:tkspstore.com, *.tkspstore.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(246 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.68.169, 172.67.197.60
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3035::6815:44a9, 2606:4700:3035::ac43:c53c
Name Servers:
bayan.ns.cloudflare.com
vera.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mx1.privateemail.com
10: mx2.privateemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2378677118, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:56ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.privateemail.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern front-end technologies including the Element Plus UI framework and Google services for analytics and identity management. The HTML content is extensive but mostly technical and UI-related, with limited visible business content. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization appears good based on responsive meta tags and CSS. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the content. Technical debt is moderate due to missing compliance and security features.
Analyze Another Website