Skip to main content

Is tld-box.at a Scam? Security Check Results - nic.at GmbH Reviews

tld-box.at favicon

Is tld-box.at Safe? Security Analysis for nic.at GmbH

Check if tld-box.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyAustriamedium
Matomo analyticsLaravel (indicated by laravel_session cookie)Bootstrap CSS frameworkjQuery (implied by bootstrap usage)Custom cookie consent scripts
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:28:56 AM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

nic.at GmbH operates as the official registry for Austrian domain extensions and offers comprehensive services through its sister company tldbox GmbH for top-level domain consulting and registry backend operations. The company holds a strong market position in the domain registration industry with decades of experience and recognized certifications such as ISO 27001. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and robust privacy and security compliance including GDPR and NIS2 standards. The use of Matomo analytics demonstrates a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, CSRF protection, and secure cookie handling. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high trustworthiness and professionalism.

Detected Technologies

Matomo analyticsLaravel (indicated by laravel_session cookie)Bootstrap CSS frameworkjQuery (implied by bootstrap usage)Custom cookie consent scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

nic.at GmbH is a key player in the domain registry sector, focusing on Austrian and generic top-level domains. Their business model combines consulting services for new gTLD applicants with technical registry backend operations, targeting businesses and organizations seeking unique domain identities. The company benefits from a well-established brand, ISO certification, and a network of partner sites and subsidiaries. Their offerings include domain search, registration, management, and security services, supported by clear pricing and process transparency. The presence of multiple contact channels and social media engagement indicates a customer-centric approach and active market presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@nic.at
s*****@tldbox.at

Phone Numbers (1)

+4366246***

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website and underlying infrastructure exhibit a mature security posture. HTTPS is enforced with secure cookie flags and SameSite attributes. The presence of CSRF tokens and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligns with best practices. ISO 27001 certification and compliance with GDPR and NIS2 frameworks further strengthen their security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a published security.txt and explicit incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

nic.at GmbH

Description:

tldbox GmbH is a sister company of nic.at, the Austrian registry for .at domains. They offer consulting, software, and registry services for top-level domains (TLDs), including support for new gTLD applications and registry backend operations.

Key Services:
TLD consultingRegistry backend servicesDomain registration and management
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Matomo analyticsLaravel (indicated by laravel_session cookie)Bootstrap CSS frameworkjQuery (implied by bootstrap usage)Custom cookie consent scripts
Frameworks:
Laravel
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF protection
  • Cookie consent with opt-out and opt-in mechanisms
  • ISO 27001 certification
  • GDPR and NIS2 compliance

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo/Piwik
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo/Piwik
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

95/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.136.34.144 ip4:83.136.34.145 ip4:83.136.33.227/32 ip4:83.136.35.14/32 ip4:193.104.82.0/24 ip6:2a02:850:1:2::144 ip6:2a02:850:1:2::145 include:_spf.univie.ac.at include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:bounce-vie.nic.at ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-analyze@ops.nic.at
Forensic Reports:dmarc-analyze@ops.nic.at

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:198.251.90.127
Name Servers:
ns1.nic.atDNS only
ns10.univie.ac.atDNS only
ns2.nic.atDNS only
ns5.nic.atDNS only
ns5.univie.ac.atDNS only
MX Records:
10: nic-at.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025093109, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:55ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.136.34.144 ip4:83.136.34.145 ip4:83.136.33.227/32 ip4:83.136.35.14/32 ip4:193.104.82.0/24 ip6:2a02:850:1:2::144 ip6:2a02:850:1:2::145 include:_spf.univie.ac.at include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:bounce-vie.nic.at ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Laravel framework and Bootstrap for responsive design. It uses Matomo for privacy-focused analytics and implements a detailed cookie consent banner with opt-in/out controls. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but HTTPS and secure cookie practices indicate a well-managed infrastructure. Opportunities exist to further modernize security headers and improve incident response capabilities.
Analyze Another Website