Skip to main content

Is tmall.lc a Scam? Security Check Results - 浙江天猫网络有限公司 Reviews

tmall.lc favicon

Is tmall.lc Safe? Security Analysis for 浙江天猫网络有限公司

Check if tmall.lc is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceChinaenterprise
WordPressCSSFlash (legacy for product display)
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 11:09:54 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.tmall.lc serves as a promotional and informational platform about the Tmall brand, a major Chinese B2C e-commerce marketplace operated by Zhejiang Tmall Network Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Alibaba Group. The site provides historical and business context about Tmall, its development, and key features, targeting Chinese-speaking consumers interested in online shopping. The business model is clearly B2C with a focus on brand flagship stores and authentic product offerings. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Flatbox theme and includes legacy Flash elements for product display, indicating some outdated technology use. Security posture is weak, with no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. Contact information and incident response details are absent, reducing trust and compliance levels. Overall, the site is moderately informative but lacks critical security and privacy features expected for an e-commerce related platform.

Detected Technologies

WordPressCSSFlash (legacy for product display)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Tmall is positioned as a leading e-commerce platform in China with a strong brand presence and extensive product categories. The site reflects a large enterprise with a mature market position and a broad target audience across China and Asia. The business model focuses on B2C retail with official brand flagship stores and consumer protections like seven-day returns. The website links to multiple related domains indicating a partnership ecosystem around Alibaba's e-commerce ecosystem. However, the site itself lacks direct business contact details and formal policies, which may limit its credibility as an official channel. Growth indicators include recent updates on merchant onboarding and business restructuring within the Alibaba group. The site serves more as a content hub rather than a transactional platform.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of the website is low. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration in the provided data, no security headers are detected, and the use of Flash technology introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy, cookie, and incident response policies indicates poor compliance with modern data protection standards such as GDPR. No forms or data collection mechanisms were found, which reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. The site lacks transparency on security practices and does not provide contact channels for reporting security incidents. These factors collectively suggest a need for significant improvements in security posture and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with valid SSL certificates and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

浙江天猫网络有限公司

Description:

天猫是中国最大的线上综合性购物平台之一,原名淘宝商城,属于B2C模式,整合数千家品牌商和生产商,提供一站式购物解决方案。拥有丰富的品牌旗舰店和多样化商品,强调正品保障和消费者权益保护。

Key Services:
品牌旗舰店销售综合性商品购物平台正品保障七天无理由退换货多品类覆盖
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressCSSFlash (legacy for product display)
Frameworks:
Flatbox WordPress Theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a promotional/informational site about Tmall and related e-commerce platforms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:8.223.8.216
Name Servers:
daisy.dnspod.netDNS only
index.dnspod.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1750597414, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:399ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Flatbox theme, indicating a common and flexible platform choice. The presence of Flash technology for product display is outdated and poses security and compatibility risks. The site shows basic mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no explicit hosting provider identified. The site structure includes multiple internal and external links related to Alibaba's e-commerce ecosystem. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but requires modernization and security hardening to meet current web standards.
Analyze Another Website