Skip to main content

Is tmatic.de a Scam? Security Check Results - Technomatic Reviews

tmatic.de favicon

Is tmatic.de Safe? Security Analysis for Technomatic

Check if tmatic.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingGermanysmall
WordPress 5.4.16jQueryYoast SEOGoogle reCAPTCHA v3LazySizes (lazy loading images)+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:32:44 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Technomatic is a specialized company providing full-cycle software development services for industrial controllers and robots, including commissioning and ongoing support. The company targets industrial clients primarily in Central Europe, with a focus on automotive manufacturing sectors. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, highlighting key services such as automated system programming, robot programming, and manufacturing service support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools like Yoast SEO and Google reCAPTCHA, ensuring a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and anti-bot measures, though it lacks advanced security headers and explicit policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-structured but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.4.16jQueryYoast SEOGoogle reCAPTCHA v3LazySizes (lazy loading images)Slick Slider

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a niche B2B service provider in the manufacturing automation sector, working with notable automotive clients such as Porsche, Audi, VW, and Tesla. Their business model revolves around expert software development and support services, leveraging certified professionals with electronics backgrounds. The website content and client references indicate a stable market presence in Central Europe. Growth potential is supported by active career listings and ongoing projects. The absence of detailed corporate registration data on the site suggests a small to medium enterprise with a focused operational scope.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@tmatic.de

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Technomatic demonstrates a good baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and integration of Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms to mitigate spam and abuse. However, the lack of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. GDPR compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure processes are not publicly documented, which could impact trust with security-conscious clients.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Technomatic

Description:

Is a company that deals with a full cycle of software development for industrial controllers and robots, including the commissioning stage and following service support.

Key Services:
Automated system programming and commissioningRobot programmingManufacture service support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.4.16jQueryYoast SEOGoogle reCAPTCHA v3LazySizes (lazy loading images)Slick Slider
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:80.81.45.74
Name Servers:
ns01.hostings.lv
ns02.hostings.lv
MX Records:
0: tmatic-de.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024080901, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:165ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 5.4.16, utilizing jQuery and Yoast SEO for content management and search optimization. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used for spam protection on forms. LazySizes library is implemented for efficient image loading, improving performance. Hosting is provided by hostings.lv, with domain DNS pointing to ns01.hostings.lv and ns02.hostings.lv. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is an opportunity to modernize by updating WordPress and dependencies to latest versions and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website