Skip to main content

Is tn56.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 东莞市天南物流有限公司 Reviews

Is tn56.com Safe? Security Analysis for 东莞市天南物流有限公司

Check if tn56.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationChinamedium
jQuery 1.4Font AwesomeCustom JavaScriptCSS3HTML5
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 8:37:54 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

东莞市天南物流有限公司是一家专注于珠三角及全国范围内物流运输服务的专业物流公司,提供整车运输、零担运输、大件运输及搬家等一站式物流服务。公司拥有广泛的物流线路网络和合作伙伴,致力于为客户提供门到门的高效物流解决方案。网站内容丰富,覆盖多个省市的物流专线,面向企业及个人客户,体现出较强的市场覆盖能力和服务多样性。技术方面,网站采用较为传统的技术栈,存在一定的技术更新需求,移动端优化和性能表现一般。安全方面,缺乏HTTPS证书和安全头部配置,未发现隐私政策和合规声明,存在一定的安全和合规风险。整体而言,网站业务信息清晰,内容相关性强,但安全和隐私合规性需加强以提升用户信任和合规水平。

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.4Font AwesomeCustom JavaScriptCSS3HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司定位为区域性重要的物流服务提供商,业务涵盖整车、零担、大件运输及搬家等,服务覆盖全国多个省市,拥有广泛的合作网络。其商业模式基于整合物流资源和回程车调度,提升运输效率。网站显示公司注重客户服务,提供多种增值服务如包装、保价及仓储配送。缺乏公开的财务或注册信息,WHOIS数据缺失降低了业务透明度。友情链接显示与多家相关物流及供应链企业有合作关系,体现一定的行业生态圈。整体业务模式稳健,但需提升数字化和合规能力以支持未来增长。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

139*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站当前安全成熟度较低,未检测到HTTPS加密,缺少安全相关HTTP头部,未公开隐私政策或安全事件响应信息。使用的技术栈较旧,存在潜在安全风险。表单存在但未见安全防护措施说明。缺乏漏洞披露和数据保护官信息,合规性不足。建议尽快部署SSL证书,完善安全头部配置,公开隐私及安全政策,提升安全意识和合规管理,以降低潜在的业务风险和法律风险。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

部署并强制使用HTTPS,确保数据传输安全

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

东莞市天南物流有限公司

Description:

东莞天南物流公司-专业的厂家物流服务商,珠三角到全国各地物流专线运输,集零担整车搬家迁厂大件运输于一体的一站式物流服务公司,珠三角到全国整车运输、整车配货。与全国千余台车辆、数千家物流企业结成了合作伙伴关系,初步形成了有特色的全国物流服务网络。

Key Services:
整车运输零担运输大件运输搬家服务仓储配送回程车调度投标运输
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.4Font AwesomeCustom JavaScriptCSS3HTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact forms present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu customer search
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu customer search script
Marketing Tools:
Baidu customer search
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is in Chinese language targeting logistics customers in China

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

33 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:43.138.173.113
Name Servers:
ns1.ename.netDNS only
ns2.ename.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1753927841, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:448ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用传统的HTML5和CSS3技术,使用较旧版本的jQuery库和Font Awesome图标库,缺乏现代前端框架支持。页面结构清晰,导航合理,但移动端优化有限。无明显CMS平台迹象,可能为定制开发。性能表现中等,存在技术债务风险。缺少HTTPS和安全头部,影响整体安全性。建议技术升级,采用现代前端框架和响应式设计,提升用户体验和安全防护能力。
Analyze Another Website