Skip to main content

Is toad.social a Scam? Security Check Results - toad.social Reviews

toad.social favicon

Is toad.social Safe? Security Analysis for toad.social

Check if toad.social is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Mastodon 4.4.3ReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVG iconsWebSockets (wss://toad.social)
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:37:59 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

toad.social is an independent Mastodon social networking server operated by David Troy, a technology pioneer and investigative journalist focused on democracy-related issues. The platform provides a federated microblogging service as part of the broader fediverse ecosystem, targeting general audiences interested in thoughtful participation and discussion. The website is built on Mastodon version 4.4.3, leveraging modern web technologies including React and WebSockets for real-time communication. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with a clean and consistent branding approach. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and script integrity checks, though some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms and terms of service. WHOIS data is limited due to TLD restrictions and privacy protection, but the domain appears legitimate given the known operator and active user base. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

Mastodon 4.4.3ReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVG iconsWebSockets (wss://toad.social)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates as a small independent social networking server within the Mastodon fediverse, providing decentralized microblogging services. Its competitive advantage lies in its association with a known operator and focus on thoughtful discourse around democracy and technology. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely rely on community support or donations typical for Mastodon instances. The target customer segment includes privacy-conscious users and those interested in alternative social media platforms. The platform's open-source nature and federation capabilities position it well within the decentralized social media market. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident. Growth indicators include active user statistics and ongoing platform updates.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (3)

l*****@med-mastodon.comThe
g*****@universeodon.comLaugh
Q*****@mastodon.socialUnderstand

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate to good. HTTPS is properly implemented, and script/style integrity attributes are used to prevent tampering. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks explicit incident response contacts or security policies, which could hinder rapid response to security events. GDPR compliance is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small social platform but could be improved with additional headers and formal security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

toad.social

Description:

Mastodon server operated by David Troy, a tech pioneer and investigative journalist addressing threats to democracy. Thoughtful participation and discussion welcome.

Key Services:
Mastodon social networkingFederated microblogging
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Mastodon 4.4.3ReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVG iconsWebSockets (wss://toad.social)
Frameworks:
Mastodon
Platforms:
Fediverse
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of integrity attributes on scripts and stylesheets

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a Mastodon social network instance operated by David Troy.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:169.61.78.163
Name Servers:
ns-1020.awsdns-63.netDNS only
ns-1327.awsdns-37.orgDNS only
ns-1730.awsdns-24.co.ukDNS only
ns-446.awsdns-55.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: inbound-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:31ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on Mastodon 4.4.3, React, and ES modules, ensuring modular and maintainable code. The use of WebSockets supports real-time updates essential for social networking. Performance is moderate, with CDN-hosted assets improving load times. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with semantic HTML and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no detected CMS beyond Mastodon itself. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical risks include missing security headers and limited privacy mechanisms, which should be addressed to reduce exposure and improve compliance.
Analyze Another Website