Skip to main content

Is ton.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf Reviews

ton.org favicon

Is ton.org Safe? Security Analysis for Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Check if ton.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIcelandlarge
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSWeb fonts (Inter, JetBrains Mono)SVG icons
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:26:57 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

TON.org represents The Open Network, a decentralized blockchain platform designed to onboard 500 million users on-chain, leveraging technology originally developed by Telegram. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for the TON ecosystem, offering resources such as wallets, staking, payments, domains, and community tools. It targets developers, crypto enthusiasts, and the broader Web3 community, positioning itself as a community-driven and open internet platform. The domain is mature, registered since 2003, with privacy protection in place, consistent with blockchain project practices. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with optimized fonts and SVG graphics, delivering excellent performance and mobile responsiveness. The site uses Cloudflare DNS services and enforces HTTPS, contributing to a secure and reliable user experience. However, the absence of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer protection. Yet, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for trust and readiness in the blockchain space. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, TON.org is a professionally designed and technically sound platform with strong community and ecosystem focus. To enhance trust and compliance, it should publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, provide clear contact information, and establish formal security and incident response documentation.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSWeb fonts (Inter, JetBrains Mono)SVG icons

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

TON.org operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on decentralized internet infrastructure and cryptocurrency services. Its business model revolves around community-driven development and ecosystem growth, offering tools and services that facilitate blockchain adoption and usage. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its association with Telegram technology and a large target audience of Web3 users. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees, staking incentives, and ecosystem partnerships. The site links to multiple ecosystem-related domains, indicating a broad partnership and service network. Growth indicators include extensive content coverage and active community engagement channels. Strategically, TON.org emphasizes decentralization, security, and usability, aiming to position itself as a leading open network for blockchain applications. The lack of direct company contact details suggests a decentralized organizational structure or community governance model.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of TON.org is moderate to strong. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and Cloudflare DNS, enhancing transport and DNS security. Domain registration is protected with privacy services and clientTransferProhibited status, reducing hijacking risks. However, the absence of security headers and published security policies limits transparency and defense-in-depth. No incident response or abuse contact information is provided, which could delay response to security events. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site does not appear to use vulnerable third-party libraries based on script sources. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and other regulations. The site would benefit from implementing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to foster responsible security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Description:

A decentralized and open internet designed to onboard 500M people on-chain, built by the community using technology developed by Telegram.

Key Services:
WalletsToncoin cryptocurrencyStakingPaymentsDomainsCross-chain bridgesCommunity toolsGameFiMemecoins & Tokens
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSWeb fonts (Inter, JetBrains Mono)SVG icons
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

20/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports@ton.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1529 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:3.122.11.208, 18.196.202.41, 3.69.152.103
Name Servers:
dion.ns.cloudflare.com
fiona.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382288724, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:52ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js and React frameworks, leveraging modern web technologies including web fonts (Inter, JetBrains Mono) and SVG graphics for crisp visuals. Hosting appears to be supported by Cloudflare DNS services, contributing to performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and preloaded fonts for fast rendering. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is fast with deferred script loading and minimal blocking resources. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced with ARIA roles and landmarks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented, supporting a professional user experience.
Analyze Another Website