Skip to main content

Is tonstakers.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Tonstakers Reviews

tonstakers.com favicon

Is tonstakers.com Safe? Security Analysis for Tonstakers

Check if tonstakers.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptSVG graphics
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 11:47:56 PM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Tonstakers is a leading liquid staking protocol focused on the TON blockchain, providing users with the ability to stake Toncoin and receive tsTON tokens that maintain liquidity and enable DeFi participation. The platform boasts a significant user base and total value locked, positioning itself as a market leader in TON staking services. The website is built on modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, offering a fast, responsive, and well-structured user experience optimized for both desktop and mobile users. Security is a priority, evidenced by publicly available audit reports and a bug bounty program, although explicit incident response contact details and cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, the platform demonstrates a strong security posture and business credibility, with transparent WHOIS data and consistent domain registration information.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptSVG graphics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Tonstakers operates in the blockchain and DeFi sector, targeting cryptocurrency holders and TON blockchain users seeking liquid staking solutions. Its business model revolves around providing staking services with additional yield opportunities through leveraged and collateral staking, as well as liquidity provision on decentralized exchanges. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its large user base, high TVL, and integration with multiple Web3 services, including native Telegram support. Tonstakers is a relatively new company founded in 2023, with a medium-sized operation and a focus on technology and finance sectors. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and trust signals such as audits and social media engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Tonstakers exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and a transparent audit process conducted by Certik. The presence of a bug bounty program further enhances its security culture. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contact information, and a security.txt file indicates areas for improvement in formalizing security governance and incident management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The platform's non-custodial architecture reduces risk exposure, and the domain registration details support legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formal documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Tonstakers

Description:

Tonstakers is the largest TON liquid staking protocol offering staking of Toncoin with tsTON liquid tokens, enabling users to earn rewards while maintaining liquidity. It supports over 100,000 users and integrates with multiple Web3 and DeFi platforms.

Key Services:
TON stakingLiquid staking token issuance (tsTON)Leveraged stakingCollateral stakingDEX liquidity provision
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptSVG graphics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Audit report publicly available
  • Bug bounty program
  • Non-custodial architecture

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional liquid staking platform for TON blockchain.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

28/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(231 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:35.157.26.135, 63.176.8.218
Name Servers:
dns1.p08.nsone.net
dns2.p08.nsone.net
dns3.p08.nsone.net
dns4.p08.nsone.net
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1687434356, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:145ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks for server-side rendering and client-side interactivity. It uses SVG graphics extensively for icons and branding, contributing to a visually appealing and scalable design. Hosting is managed via NS1 DNS services, and the site employs multiple CSS stylesheets and asynchronous JavaScript chunks for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive navigation and accessible design elements. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Performance is fast with good accessibility and SEO practices, though some minor improvements in privacy compliance and security documentation are recommended.
Analyze Another Website