Skip to main content

Is tooldok.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Tooldok Reviews

tooldok.lv favicon

Is tooldok.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Tooldok

Check if tooldok.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
WordPressPHPJavaScript
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:08:13 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Tooldok is a Latvian company specializing in the sale and support of metalworking tools and technologies, established in 2013 with over 10 years of industry experience. The company targets active metalworking factories within Latvia, offering professional-grade tools and engineering solutions tailored to client needs. Their business model focuses on B2B sales with an emphasis on quality, competitive pricing, and timely delivery. The website reflects a small but professional regional business with consistent branding and relevant content.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company occupies a niche position in the Latvian manufacturing sector, serving metalworking factories with specialized tools and technical support. Their competitive advantage lies in their engineering expertise and customer-centric approach. The website indicates a focus on growth and adaptation to new technologies, though lacks extensive digital marketing or partnership disclosures. Revenue streams likely derive from direct sales and possibly service contracts. The absence of visible contact details or social media presence suggests a traditional or direct sales approach. No related or partner domains were identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers and lack of a privacy policy or incident response information highlight gaps in security maturity and compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses an older WordPress theme, which may pose risks if not regularly updated. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and transparency enhancements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Tooldok

Description:

Uzņēmums Tooldok ir dibināts 2013. gadā un šobrīd var lepoties ar vairāk nekā 10 gadu pieredzi metālapstrādes instrumentu pārdošanā un klientu atbalsta nodrošināšanā. Uzņēmumā strādā darbinieki ar pieredzi uz zināšanām metālapstrādes instrumentu pārdošanā, kā arī inženiertehniskām zināšanām, kas ļauj piedāvāt klientiem piemērotākos risinājumus. Mūsu klientiem tiek piedāvāti profesionāli metālapstrādes instrumenti par iespējami labāko cenu un iespējami ātrākajiem piegādes laikiem. Uzņēmums ir vērts uz attīstību un līdz ar to arī saviem klientiem piedāvā risinājumus, kas atbilst jaunāko tehnoloģiju progresam.

Key Services:
Sales of professional metalworking toolsCustomer supportProviding tailored engineering solutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPJavaScript
Frameworks:
WordPress Twenty Eleven theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.241 ip4:91.203.68.175 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.241
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: tooldok.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025062200, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.241 ip4:91.203.68.175 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Twenty Eleven theme, a relatively old but stable framework. The site includes standard WordPress scripts and styles, with no advanced modern JavaScript frameworks detected. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with canonical and hreflang tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph metadata. The cookie consent plugin is implemented asynchronously, indicating some attention to user privacy. No analytics or tracking services were detected, suggesting minimal data collection. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website