Is tophosts.net Safe? Security Analysis for TopHosts
Check if tophosts.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
TopHosts is a Russian-language online platform specializing in hosting provider ratings, reviews, and comparison tools. It targets Russian-speaking users seeking reliable hosting services, offering detailed information on VPS, shared hosting, dedicated servers, and related services. The platform leverages affiliate partnerships with hosting providers, providing promo codes and referral links to monetize its service. Technically, the website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, DataTables, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens but lacks explicit security headers and detailed privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is accessible, professional, and trustworthy, with moderate security posture and some compliance gaps.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
TopHosts holds a solid position in the Russian hosting review market, offering comprehensive hosting provider ratings and user feedback. Its business model is affiliate-driven, generating revenue through referrals and promo codes. The platform serves a medium-sized audience primarily in Russia and neighboring countries. It maintains partnerships with notable hosting providers like AdminVPS and Fornex, enhancing its credibility. The site’s content strategy focuses on detailed service comparisons, user-generated reviews, and promotional offers, which support user engagement and conversion. Growth potential exists through expanding compliance transparency and enhancing direct contact channels.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF tokens are implemented, indicating awareness of common web security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited formal security governance. Compliance with GDPR or similar regulations is not clearly evidenced, which could pose risks given the user data collected via forms and analytics.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
TopHosts
Честные обзоры хостинг-провайдеров, удобный подбор, поиск и сравнение хостингов. Рейтинг хостингов по услугам и отзывы реальных пользователей. Найдите и выберите идеальный хостинг для вашего проекта с помощью нашего надежного сервиса
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- CSRF token present in meta tags
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a Russian-language hosting review and comparison platform
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration
LOWCurrent value: "nosniff, nosniff"
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Twitter
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 43 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings