Skip to main content

Is totalizators.com a Scam? Security Check Results - totalizators.com Reviews

totalizators.com favicon

Is totalizators.com Safe? Security Analysis for Totalizators 🎖️ Labākie Sporta Totalizatori Latvijā【2025】

Check if totalizators.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
Cloudflare DNSGoogle FontsAmazon Cloudfront CDN
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:08:10 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Totalizators.com is a Latvian language website specializing in expert reviews and comparisons of licensed sports totalizators (bookmakers) in Latvia for the year 2025. The site positions itself as a leading platform for Latvian sports betting customers seeking reliable information and the best offers from licensed operators. The business model appears to be affiliate-based, providing curated content and bonus offers to users. The website is well-branded and consistent, targeting an adult audience interested in legal sports betting within Latvia. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Cloudflare DNS, AWS Cloudfront CDN, Google Fonts, and likely WordPress CMS. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and a professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of a clear privacy policy and terms of service, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. No direct contact or incident response information is provided, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Cloudflare DNSGoogle FontsAmazon Cloudfront CDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets the Latvian sports betting market, focusing on licensed totalizators, which is a regulated sector. Its competitive advantage lies in expert reviews and comparison of licensed operators, helping users make informed choices. Revenue likely derives from affiliate commissions and advertising. The site’s content and branding are consistent and tailored to Latvian users, indicating a focused market approach. The domain age of over 12 years supports credibility and market presence. However, lack of explicit company information, contact details, and certifications limits full business transparency. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators such as updated content and SEO optimization suggest ongoing maintenance and relevance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (10)

s*****@x3000.comSynottipIAUI
i*****@synottip.lvOlybetIAUI
g*****@olybet.comOptibetIAUI
g*****@optibet.lvBetsafeIAUI
g*****@betsafe.lvPafbetIAUI
+5 more emails found

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security robustness. No security headers (such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS) were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency and incident response readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content, and no vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided data. Forms are present but no detailed analysis of their security was possible due to content truncation. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and incident response policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Labākie sporta totalizatori 2025 → Izvērtē ekspertu apskatus un salīdzini labākos piedāvājumus no Latvijā licencētajiem totalizatoriem

Key Services:
Expert reviewsComparison of licensed Latvian sports totalizatorsBonus offers
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Cloudflare DNSGoogle FontsAmazon Cloudfront CDN
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Latvian language sports betting comparison and review platform

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

95/100
Score

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@fbl.optin.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:totalizators.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/7/2025 (38 days)
SANs:totalizators.com, *.totalizators.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(214 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.62.246, 172.67.141.55
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3034::6815:3ef6, 2606:4700:3035::ac43:8d37
Name Servers:
lorna.ns.cloudflare.com
will.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: inbound-smtp.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com
SOA:Serial: 2376980518, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:586ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack with Cloudflare DNS, AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, and Google Fonts for typography. The presence of WordPress-specific CSS and classes suggests WordPress CMS usage. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, likely benefiting from CDN usage but could be improved with further optimization. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. Accessibility is basic but present. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected in the provided content. The site lacks advanced frameworks or SPA technologies, indicating a traditional multi-page architecture.
Analyze Another Website