Skip to main content

Is tourduleman.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - BCGE Reviews

tourduleman.ch favicon

Is tourduleman.ch Safe? Security Analysis for BCGE

https://tourduleman.ch

Check if tourduleman.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceSwitzerlandlarge
Google Tag ManagerreCAPTCHAGravity FormsYoast SEOFontAwesome+1 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 2:12:10 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website bcge.tourduleman.ch is an informational site related to BCGE, a Swiss banking institution, and the Tour du Léman rowing event. It serves to promote or provide information about the event and the bank's involvement. The site is built on WordPress using common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Gravity Forms, with tracking via Google Tag Manager and bot protection via reCAPTCHA. The technical infrastructure is standard for a small to medium-sized event or corporate promotional site, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security policies, which impacts its privacy compliance and security posture. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the content is safe for general audiences. The absence of detailed WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy, security, and transparency aspects.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerreCAPTCHAGravity FormsYoast SEOFontAwesomeFlickity Carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

BCGE is a well-established banking institution in Switzerland, and this site appears to be a dedicated microsite for the Tour du Léman rowing event, likely sponsored or organized by BCGE. The business model combines financial services with community engagement through event sponsorship. The target audience includes rowing enthusiasts, participants, and BCGE clients. The site leverages WordPress CMS and SEO tools to maintain visibility. There is no evidence of direct e-commerce or transactional capabilities on this site. The lack of contact details and policies suggests the site is primarily informational rather than transactional. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiary or related domains were identified.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (3)

8*****@sentry.vnv.ch
i*****@nautique.ch
c*****@maxcomm.ch

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No security headers were detected in the HTML content. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and Google Tag Manager for analytics. There is no visible security policy or incident response information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, publishing security and privacy policies, and providing clear contact channels for incident response.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

BCGE

Description:

The website appears to be related to BCGE (Banque Cantonale de Genève) and the Tour du Léman rowing event. It likely serves as an informational or promotional site for the event sponsored or organized by BCGE.

Key Services:
Banking servicesEvent sponsorship
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerreCAPTCHAGravity FormsYoast SEOFontAwesomeFlickity Carousel
Frameworks:
WordPressVisual Composer (WPBakery)
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=16000000"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.177.63.15
Name Servers:
ns1.boxis.netDNS only
ns2.boxis.netDNS only
ns3.boxis.netDNS only
ns4.boxis.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2024100203, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with Visual Composer and uses common web technologies including Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and Yoast SEO. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts. The site appears to be moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. The HTML content is valid and structured, though truncated in the provided data. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks beyond WordPress and its plugins. Hosting provider details are not available. The site could improve by optimizing loading times further and enhancing accessibility compliance.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about tourduleman.ch

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website