Is tower.fi Safe? Security Analysis for Tower
Check if tower.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Tower operates a decentralized exchange platform named Tower Dex, focusing on trading, earning, and governance voting on BTCFi and Babylon DEX networks. The platform leverages Bitcoin security and the Babylon network to provide a secure and efficient trading experience for cryptocurrency users. The website presents a professional and modern design built with Framer, integrating advanced analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Mixpanel, and Amplitude for user behavior tracking. However, the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and security policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of contact information and incident response details limits transparency and may affect user confidence. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with good SSL configuration and modern web technologies, but privacy compliance and security documentation need improvement.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Tower positions itself as a niche player in the decentralized exchange market, targeting cryptocurrency traders interested in Bitcoin-secured decentralized finance solutions. The business model revolves around providing a native DEX experience on the Babylon network, offering trading, earning rewards, and governance voting. The company maintains active social media channels on Discord, Telegram, and X, fostering community engagement. The website content is relevant and well-structured, supporting the business goals. However, the lack of detailed business contact information and formal policies may hinder broader market trust and regulatory compliance. The use of modern analytics and tracking indicates a focus on growth and user engagement metrics.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern analytics scripts loaded asynchronously, indicating a baseline security posture. However, there is no evidence of comprehensive security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests limited transparency in security incident handling. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security posture is moderate but would benefit significantly from enhanced security headers, documented incident response procedures, and user-facing security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Tower
Trade smarter, faster, and more securely on the BTCFi DEX with the power of Bitcoin secured Babylon
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of modern analytics scripts loaded asynchronously
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a decentralized exchange platform focused on BTCFi and Babylon networks
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 72 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings